-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de fred
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 4 avril 2008 19:01
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] SMTP auth on another server
Hi,
Just a quick question about what I need to do in order to have a =
second
server only
solutions I have then?
Thanks
-fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
Sent: 7 avril 2008 04:20
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 07/04/08 15:21
Objet: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
Thanks for your reply Francis,
I need two servers because I don't want all my users to bow down my
server
with their outgoing emails, right now they use their ISP outgoing
servers
dns
records open the door to any isp customers to use the original sender domain
)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 11/12/07 12:45
Objet: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Hi Edinilson,
Let me get this straight : am I right if I say that you
: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Which port are these clients using? Can they be set up (correctly) to=20
use SSL (port 465) or MSA (port 587)? It would seem to me that using =
SSL
would solve the problem nicely (unless the ISP is blocking that port),=20
as the ISP would then be unable to filter
In any cases, it could be nice if you could response to Davide question
about smtp logs contents :)
The best solution could be evident with some logs entries.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 11/12/07 14:13
Objet: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, 10 de December de 2007 18:55
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Hi all,
Due
-
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 de December de 2007 05:44
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Did you try ETRN facilities
PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, 10 de December de 2007 18:55
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Hi all,
Due some persistent problems with Outlook and Outlook Express with SMTP
Authentication, we are instructing some companies that uses
: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Did you try ETRN facilities.
Configure customer router to do dyndns, then use ETRN method on xmail
customers servers to get the mails back.
Notice I never tried xmail with ETRN, as client or server, so don't ask =
me
for xmail setup on both sides ;)
PS : what
@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 de December de 2007 09:45
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Hi Edinilson,
Let me get this straight : am I right if I say that you want your
customers use *your* smtp-server (whatever it is) as a smarthost, to
forward their messages?
IMHO you should let them
: Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 de December de 2007 10:17
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Forward
Which port are these clients using? Can they be set up (correctly) to
use SSL (port 465) or MSA (port 587)? It would seem to me that using SSL
would solve the problem
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Hi all,
Due some persistent problems with Outlook and Outlook Express with SMTP
Authentication, we are instructing some companies that uses our services to
install XMail Server internally.
But in Brazil many adsl connections uses dynamic ips
Did you try ETRN facilities.
Configure customer router to do dyndns, then use ETRN method on xmail
customers servers to get the mails back.
Notice I never tried xmail with ETRN, as client or server, so don't ask =
me
for xmail setup on both sides ;)
PS : what sort of problems have you with
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Ok, you made me waste *A LOT* of time, for a totally wrong analysis,
probably linked with your own compiler of XMail code additions.
The pszSMTPError string is printed only after a failure of one of
SMTPCheckReturnPath() and SMTPCheckForwardPath(), and both these
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Hi,
There's still a bug lurking in the code, but now for a fault situation
only fortunately, far as I can tell.
How to reproduce:
- use Outlook Express
- create account
- FORGET to check the checkmark 'Outgoing (SMTP) server requires
At 23.20 15/11/07, you wrote:
Not using from a long time pop before smtp auth method.
Looks like nobody is using it, indeed, since I've not yet received
feedback from others using that feature, so far ...
Anyway, a feature should either be dropped or work, IMHO ...
As noted by Davide seems
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Hi all,
apparently I have a problem with the new SysGetHostByName which
causes POP3-SMTP auth always to fail. This chainsaw patch works for me:
--- POP3Utils.cpp 2007-11-02 01:34:32.0 +0100
+++ POP3Utils.cpp.new 2007-11-16
Hi,
As I am currently testing xmail for a custom setup over here, I ran into
several issues, one of which was/is the SMTP-POP3 auth mechanism.
Using 1.25-pre22 (downloaded from link presented on this ML earlier).
Turns out that the code as is should've never worked; at it it won't
ever on my
At 18.24 16/11/07, you wrote:
Can you try the patch below?
diff --git a/POP3Utils.cpp b/POP3Utils.cpp
index 85ee92d..5b3111b 100644
--- a/POP3Utils.cpp
+++ b/POP3Utils.cpp
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ int UPopUserIpCheck(UserInfo *pUI, SYS_INET_ADDR
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
At 18.24 16/11/07, you wrote:
Can you try the patch below?
diff --git a/POP3Utils.cpp b/POP3Utils.cpp
index 85ee92d..5b3111b 100644
--- a/POP3Utils.cpp
+++ b/POP3Utils.cpp
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ int UPopUserIpCheck(UserInfo *pUI, SYS_INET_ADDR
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Screen output:
POP3 client connection from [127.0.0.1]
POP3 client exit [127.0.0.1]
SMTP client connection from [127.0.0.1]
PreIP='127.0.0.1' CurrIP='127.0.0.1'
SMTP filter run: Filter = C:\MailRoot\bin\glst\glst Retcode = 0
SMAIL local
At 20.12 16/11/07, you wrote:
Duh!?
Can you try to add here ...
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
fclose(pIpFile);
char szIPP[128];
SysInetNToA(*pPeerInfo, szIPP, sizeof(szIPP));
SysLogMessage(LOG_LEV_MESSAGE, PreIP='%s'\tCurrIP='%s'\n,
szIPP, szIP);
At 22.01 16/11/07, you wrote:
Cat you try to show me the content and metadata of the account's .ipconn
file?
dir C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
Volume in drive C is unlabeled Serial number is F8F7:824F
Directory of C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 21.34 16/11/07, you wrote:
Logs:
localhosttsd.unifi.it 127.0.0.1 2007-11-16 21:11:25
vertova LOGIN 1 614
tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it 127.0.0.1 2007-11-16 21:11:25
ZOUZOU.tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
See below for a copy, COMPLETE diff/patch is attached to this reply:
Since 7z attachments get stripped, here it is in literal uncompressed
format:
--- ../../1original/xmail/CTRLClient.cpp2007-11-02 01:34:32.0
+0100
+++ ./CTRLClient.cpp
Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 18.24 16/11/07, you wrote:
Can you try the patch below?
diff --git a/POP3Utils.cpp b/POP3Utils.cpp
index 85ee92d..5b3111b 100644
--- a/POP3Utils.cpp
+++ b/POP3Utils.cpp
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ int UPopUserIpCheck(UserInfo *pUI, SYS_INET_ADDR
const
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
See below for a copy, COMPLETE diff/patch is attached to this reply:
Since 7z attachments get stripped, here it is in literal uncompressed
format:
The patch contains *a lot* of unecessary ZeroData() (plus other
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 22.01 16/11/07, you wrote:
Cat you try to show me the content and metadata of the account's .ipconn
file?
dir C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
Volume in drive C is unlabeled Serial number is F8F7:824F
Directory
Not using from a long time pop before smtp auth method.
As noted by Davide seems your smtp and pop sessions start at same time, so
the pop 'auth' transaction could not be complete at the time the smtp
session check for a previous pop auth accepted.
IMOO pop before smtp auth is not the best way
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, John Kielkopf wrote:
Any way to get Xmail to use authentication when relaying mail with
smtprelay in mailproc.tab?
Check this out:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Przemek Czerkas wrote:
Hello,
when XMail reaches receive timeout (STD_SERVER_TIMEOUT = 90s)
during SMTP DATA phase, it silently falls-back session to pre-DATA.
Shouldn't client connection be dropped instead? Does any RFC mention
correct behaviour?
XMail does not drop
Mihai Dobre wrote:
I have some users complaining for their lost e-mails. While searching =
for=20
problem in XMail log files I've found nothing strange except some =
RCPT=3DOK=20
with no RECV at all for several messages. Because not to get killed I =
went=20
further and I've found interesting
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hi list !
I have some users complaining for their lost e-mails. While searching for
problem in XMail log files I've found nothing strange except some RCPT=OK
with no RECV at all for several messages. Because not to get killed I went
further and
Hi Pedro,
Pedro Jaramillo wrote:
The attached file is an Excel version of the SMTP LOG file.
Could anyone help to understand what each column means and how should
we treat them all? (COLUMNS A TO M)
I expect everything you need, can be found here:
http://www.henry.it/xmail/logs.html#_smtp
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 8 mars 2007 03:46
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
When using tail -f on XMail's SMTP log the message comes
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
When using tail -f on XMail's SMTP log the message comes in right after I
execute 'echo bla | sendmail ivo' on the system running exim. (note that
it IS working with TLS disabled, so it isn't in the email address or
message).
The log entries also show
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
THat seems ok. How is your AllowNullSender set?
I already checked
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 6:49 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Hello Davide
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
I'm not sure what it's trying to do. Exim says it has something to do with
the MAIL FROM: SIZE=2485 command, maybe XMail doesn't recognise the
SIZE=... part? Ive never seen that before...
It's hard (impossible??) to find out what it is really doing, I
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 6:23 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
I'm not sure what it's trying to do. Exim says it has something to do
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 6:23 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
I'm not sure what it's trying to do
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 7:58 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
- Original Message -
From
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Did I do something wrong or is this really all there is? :|
Core:/var/lib/xmail# XMail -Ms /var/lib/xmail/ -Md -Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll -Sl
SMAIL thread [00] started
---SOME MORE SMAIL THREADS
[XMail 1.24 CTRL Server] started
[XMail 1.24 CTRLS Server]
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:43 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Did I do something wrong or is this really all there is? :|
Core:/var/lib/xmail
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Hello Davide and other list members,
I was trying to use my xmail server as a smarthost (relay) for one of my
other servers, which is still using exim4.
When exim4 tried to send a message using TLS (EnableSMTP-TLS=1 in xmail's
server.tab), it ends up
- Original Message -
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Hello Davide and other list members,
I was trying to use my xmail server as a smarthost (relay) for one of my
other servers, which is still using exim4.
When exim4 tried to send a message using TLS (EnableSMTP-TLS=1 in
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Hello Davide and other list members,
I was trying to use my xmail server as a smarthost (relay) for one of my
other servers, which is still using exim4.
When exim4 tried to send a
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
Hello all,
I just installed XMailserver on a brand new machine running Fedora Core
6. I now get this error when trying to connect via SMTP:
===
220 server.name.test [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail
1.24 ESMTP Server] service ready; Thu, 22 Feb 2007
Duh!?! -100 is ERR_SHMAT and is never used in 1.24!?!
Regretfully, this is what I'm getting as a result.
I did a normal compilation from the source (make -f Makefile.lnx).
The only strange thing I can think of (different from what I'm used
to) is that this server uses RAID 0 for the
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
Duh!?! -100 is ERR_SHMAT and is never used in 1.24!?!
Ok, it's not ERR_SHMAT but ERR_NO_ROOT_DOMAIN_VAR. You're missing the
RootDomain server.tab variable.
I made a script to extract error codes, and that's the output ...
- Davide
0 --
the expected 250-response...
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
- Oorspronkelijk bericht
Afzender: xmail@xmailserver.org
Naar: xmail@xmailserver.org xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100)
localerror in processing
Datum: 22
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
details en route.
I was hoping
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
I am currently running XMail 1.23 and have started reading the
documentation for 1.24 and I had a question that I haven't come across
the answer to yet.
Is there a way in XMail to stop it advertising SMTP AUTH unless the
connection is
If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
details en route.
I was hoping there would be a way to improve the security of
Thank you very much. I also sent your response to the XMailForum.
Norb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Lord
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 11:06
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP-RDNSCheck
On 21 Oct 2006, at 9
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Martin Papadopoulos wrote:
hi there ,
how can i alter the EHLO domain when xmailserver sends emails to other
smtp servers ?
HeloDomain inside server.tab
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
You cannot change it per smtp connection when you host multiple domains.
To do that, you need to run multiple instances of xmail, each with one
domain.
The idea of the HELO/EHLO is to identify the host, rather than the domain of
the email being sent.
The host sending does not need to in the same
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:16 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Failing on Gentoo Server
POP seems to work, all the time.=A0 SMTP works to domains where I have
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Tim McGarvey wrote:
There are a number of files in those directories, each containing a whole
bunch of nearly identical entries that say:
[PeekTime] 1133915538 : Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:32:18 -
ErrCode = -40
ErrString = Invalid server address
ErrInfo =
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 5:30 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Failing on Gentoo Server
If recipientdomain.com has valid MX records, it's a DNS issue. First, try
@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
This is mine:
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.21 POP3 Server] service =
ready; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:05:27 +0100
Whatever I do next...my telnetbox closes!!
Gr. Martin
=20
Here's an exact copy of a POP3 telnet session
Bill
=20
=20
--
From: =09rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: =09Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: =09[xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
This is mine:
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.21 POP3 Server] servi=
ce =3D
ready
: =09rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: =09Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: =09[xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
This is mine:
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.21 POP3 Server] servi=
ce =3D
ready; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:05:27
I'd start xmail in debug mode (see readme/doco) and then watch the screen
logs.
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of rommelaccount
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 7:53 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works
are ctrlaccounts.tab and
ctrl.ipmap.tab
Bill
--
From: rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:53 AM
To:xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
To test if the server can receive mail I sent a mail from my hotmailacco=
unt
/
All you have to configure to get it to work are ctrlaccounts.tab and
ctrl.ipmap.tab
Bill
--
From:rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:53 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
and
ctrl.ipmap.tab
Bill
--
From:rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:53 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
To test if the server can receive mail I sent a mail from my hotmailacco
it to
work are ctrlaccounts.tab and ctrl.ipmap.tab
Bill
--
From:rommelaccount[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Saturday, February 18, 2006 12:53 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
To test if the server can receive mail
I only did [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not USER.should I?
Gr. Martin
It was unclear from your message whether you are entering the POP3
commands or just the user name. The syntax for a POP3 session through
telnet goes:
USER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PASS password
STAT
QUIT
STAT will list
Here's an exact copy of a POP3 telnet session with my mail server - the
only change is to replace my password with . Note that lines
sent by the server begin with + (the banner line will wrap in the
email). The lines I typed are the user, pass, stat, and quit lines.
+OK [EMAIL
This is mine:
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.21 POP3 Server] service ready; Thu, 16 Feb
2006 14:05:27 +0100
Whatever I do next...my telnetbox closes!!
Gr. Martin
Here's an exact copy of a POP3 telnet session with my mail server - the
only change is to replace my password with
Hmm... Is this machine accessible from the net? I tried telnetting to
mbuijtendijk.nl and the banner that came up was for a Kerio mail server...
The telnet window closing - the only reason I know of for that to happen
is an invalid character in the input (something non-ASCII). Otherwise,
you
. Martin
_
From: Tracy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:36:08 +0100
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
Hmm... Is this machine accessible from the net? I tried telnetting to
mbuijtendijk.nl and the banner that came up was for a Kerio
an error message
The box is a NSLU2 from linksys which is going to replace my server
(mbuijtendijk.nl).
Gr. Martin
_
From: Tracy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:36:08 +0100
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
Hmm
, February 16, 2006 5:00 AM
To:xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp works / pop doesn't
This is mine:
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.21 POP3 Server] service =
ready; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:05:27 +0100
Whatever I do next...my telnetbox closes!!
Gr. Martin
=20
Here's an exact
Em Dom 29 Jan 2006 16:19, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
Not with the current model, in which username and password are passed to
the external program. I'd need to pass the salt, username and MD5 hashes,
and haave the external program do MD5 computations and matches by itself.
- Davide
I got,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Em Qua 25 Jan 2006 18:01, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
Certain authentications, like CRAM-MD5 for example, has not a clear text
password but an MD5 hash of the password plus other stuff. So you cannot
fit the usual
Em Qua 25 Jan 2006 18:01, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
Certain authentications, like CRAM-MD5 for example, has not a clear text
password but an MD5 hash of the password plus other stuff. So you cannot
fit the usual call-this-external-program-with-user-and-passwd model.
- Davide
Thanks Davide,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Hi,
I created a program to work with userauth (all functions: auth, add, del,=20
edit, drop). This program stores things into a mysql table for my=20
administrative system needs.
It's working almost perfectly, also authenticating pop users,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2005, 15:13 -0800 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
I'll put this in my to-do list. The ip-map check can be moved inside where
all other checks are, so that we can make it bypassable with AUTH.
Thanks - that's cool and exactly what we need!
Achim
-
To unsubscribe from this
Tracy:
You might want to upgrade to 1.22, IIRC there was some kind of obscure
security bug fix in 1.22 that was supposedly exploitable in 1.21.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:44:39 PM, you wrote:
I ended up going in
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Hello List,
because of the amount of Virus-Emails we are facing a major problem now.
First let me explain our current MX-Constellation:
- Mail for exmaple.com has MX-Entries to mx.waaf.net
- mx.waaf.net are several machines running
If you're running GNU/Linux on your mail server you can use iptables to
create a firewall to protect XMail. Works a dream here.
Adrian Hicks
On 08 December 2005 07:13, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Hello List,
because of the amount of Virus-Emails we
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Adrian Hicks wrote:
If you're running GNU/Linux on your mail server you can use iptables to
create a firewall to protect XMail. Works a dream here.
The problem he's having is that he wants an AUTH session to overrule the
IP blocking.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Adrian Hicks wrote:
If you're running GNU/Linux on your mail server you can use iptables to
create a firewall to protect XMail. Works a dream here.
The problem he's having is that he wants an AUTH session to overrule the
IP blocking.
I
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:54, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Hello List,
because of the amount of Virus-Emails we are facing a major problem now.
First let me explain our current MX-Constellation:
- Mail for exmaple.com has MX-Entries to mx.waaf.net
- mx.waaf.net are several machines running
As smtp-imap.tab takes precedence, you can't use it
First possible solution :
Use server.tab SmtpConfig variable setting it to mail-auth and ask your
mx servers to use authentication too to send to the xmail box
Second possible solution :
Create a filter.pre-data type filter that test
Did you make sure to set the first line of your smtp.ipmap.tab files to:
0.0.0.0 [tab] 0.0.0.0 [tab] DENY [tab] 1
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: Achim Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 6:54 AM
Subject: [xmail] SMTP-Relaying only
The mail-auth setting in server.tab may be what you're after, but I
don't know if it overrides smtprelay.tab or not.
-John
Achim Schmidt wrote:
Hello List,
because of the amount of Virus-Emails we are facing a major problem now.
First let me explain our current MX-Constellation:
- Mail for
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Tuesday, November 29, 2005 6:46 AM:
how can i enable (if not already enabled) smtp logs in
my xmail server? I want it to record sender,
recipient, timestamp, subject
It is not the first time, you ask dumb questions.
Get in your mind, reading the manual
Sönke, thanks again! That will do the trick ...
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Jeff,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:09
AM:
I am using the cmdaliases functionality to forward certain
emails to an
Exchange 2003 Server. I would like to disable general SMTP for
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
I was wondering if there was any more talk about making XMail SMTP
external Auth act just like it's pop3 external auth. (This would remove
the need to sync passwords with xmail and leave just leave the need to
Sync needed accounts)
The most
Jonn,
Adding mail.company.com to smtprelay tab (if it were possible) would
permit ANYONE to relay through your server as long as they forged the from
address. - Not desirable.
Your issue - I need clarification I think.
Let me get this straight;
You have Xmail server and squirrelmail on the
On 15.07.2005 21:31, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi everyone -
I am running XMail 1.21 on FreeBSD 5.4 - everything runs great. However,
although HeloDomain is set (to mail.buehlertech.net and
mail2.buehlertech.net) my greeting remains, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I assume the prefix is
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my [SmtpServerDomain] is set to buehlertech.net, does it
require the prefix (i.e. mail or mail2.buehlertech.net)?
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 15.07.2005 21:31, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi everyone -
I am running XMail 1.21 on FreeBSD 5.4 -
On 15.07.2005 22:48, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my [SmtpServerDomain] is set to buehlertech.net, does it
require the prefix (i.e. mail or mail2.buehlertech.net)?
Yes is does. That value is exactly what you wanna change. But it isn't
the HELO domain!
-
Hi Sönke -
When I change [SmtpServerDomain] by adding the prefix (mail2) then the
resulting greeting is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that correct? I wasn't expecting the numeric value before the domain...
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my
Yes the numeric portion is correct - it's the data to create an MD5 hash for
a secured login.
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Buehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 4:56 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp greeting helodomain
Hi Sönke
Jeremy:
First, you should find WHERE is delivered email. SMTP log files will
show you the result as RCPT OK or Mailbox unavailable: in the first
case, you have the Destination IP; in second case you will find if mail
is delivered to the wrong server, but will indicate it HAS a
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
