Hello, is it possible to bypass all filters for a specific domain?
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
At 11.55 13/04/11, you wrote:
How can I debug filters operations?
You can try running XMail with command line switches --debug -Md -Qg
-Md enables verbose output on the console, including filters operations
-Qg is supposed to enable filters logging (undocumented)
Back in 2005, a helpful
On 08/04/2011 18:26, L wrote:
I'm testing filters.
It seem that xmail doesn't execute the bash script
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
On 08/04/2011 09:08, L wrote:
Can someone help me creating filters to make copy of any ingoing and
outgoing email that transit through the server (put a copy of any email
in a specific folder)?
I'm testing filters.
With phpxmail I had create this off-line In filter:
#cat /var/Mai
On 08/04/2011 14:03, Chris Franklin wrote:
What OS?
I'm using xmail on a qnap NAS (linux).
Thank
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
What OS?
On Apr 8, 2011 3:37 AM, "L" wrote:
Can someone help me creating filters to make copy of any ingoing and
outgoing email that transit through the server (put a copy of any email in a
specific folder)?
Thank you very much.
___
xma
Can someone help me creating filters to make copy of any ingoing and
outgoing email that transit through the server (put a copy of any email
in a specific folder)?
Thank you very much.
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http
Le 12/01/2010 21:44, Davide Libenzi :
>> Rather when they receive a message sent to this ML. I'd like some
>> filters not to be triggered.
>
> Nope, you can't. Not w/out a filter.
Thanks Davide !
___
xmail mailing lis
ou mean, if the mailing list ML has memebers {A, B, C}, you want filters
> > not to run when one of {A, B, C} sends a message?
>
> Rather when they receive a message sent to this ML. I'd like some
> filters not to be triggered.
Nope, you can't. Not w/out a filter.
Le 12/01/2010 19:13, Davide Libenzi :
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Filip Supera wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to be sure a filter won't be executed on members of a ML ?
>
> You mean, if the mailing list ML has memebers {A, B, C}, you want filters
> no
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Filip Supera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to be sure a filter won't be executed on members of a ML ?
You mean, if the mailing list ML has memebers {A, B, C}, you want filters
not to run when one of {A, B, C} sends a message?
If this is the case, then n
address
> used for SMTP authentication")
> - filter execution flag to aex ("exclude filter execution in case of
> authenticated sender")
>
> This should exclude filter execution for members of a closed ML.
Thank you Francesco but in that case, all authenticated senders will b
At 11.42 12/01/10, you wrote:
Is there a way to be sure a filter won't be executed on members of a ML ?
You can try setting:
- ML users' write permissions to A ("check done using the email
address used for SMTP authentication")
- filter execution flag to aex ("exclude filter execution in cas
Hello,
Is there a way to be sure a filter won't be executed on members of a ML ?
Thanks.
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoy=E9 : jeudi 30 ao=FBt 2007 20:52
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Filters dont seem to fire
>
>
>On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Vinny Wadding
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
> Ahhh ok!
> Is there any way of being able to fire this filter for mail going to a
> specific server?
>
>
> Is there any way to
Nope.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMA
*" {tab} "*" {tab}"111.222.333.444/32" {tab}"0.0.0.0/0"
>> {tab}"xm-filtername.tab"
>>
>> Am I reading the documentation wrong and setting things up wrong. Or
>> does the filter system work differently to when you have custom
> does the filter system work differently to when you have custom actions
> applied to domains? I thought that filters should apply to all messages
> either entering or leaving the server (depending on how the filters are
> configured). If it is possible, how do I configur
uot; {tab}"111.222.333.444/32" {tab}"0.0.0.0/0"
{tab}"xm-filtername.tab"
Am I reading the documentation wrong and setting things up wrong. Or
does the filter system work differently to when you have custom actions
applied to domains? I thought that filters sh
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Emmanuel Gonzalez
>Envoy=E9 : mercredi 7 f=E9vrier 2007 10:52
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Filters
>
>
> Hello,
>
>I ha
; "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0"
"av-filter.tab"
Filters/av-filter.tab
"C:\MailRoot\bin\xav\xav.exe" "C:\MailRoot\bin\xav" "@@FILE"
"@@FROM" "@@RCPT""6"
(the las
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Brian Z wrote:
>
> I am trying to find out why my filter isn't firing.
>
> I am running the latest version of xmail server.
>
> I ran xmail through the command line and added -Qg to have it log filter
> acitivity.
>
> The filter though still isn't firing and I don't see
I am trying to find out why my filter isn't firing.
I am running the latest version of xmail server.
I ran xmail through the command line and added -Qg to have it log filter
acitivity.
The filter though still isn't firing and I don't see any additional logging
in any of the log files or in th
nzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:14 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: macros available to various filters
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
> I just noticed that macros @@MSGID & @@MSGREF are available in in/out
> filters, but return nothing when used in a pos
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
> I just noticed that macros @@MSGID & @@MSGREF are available in in/out
> filters, but return nothing when used in a post-data filter.
> Also the values of @@REMOTEADDR & @@LOCALADDR return "[1.2.3.4]:25" for
> in/out filters,
Davide,
I just noticed that macros @@MSGID & @@MSGREF are available in in/out
filters, but return nothing when used in a post-data filter.
Also the values of @@REMOTEADDR & @@LOCALADDR return "[1.2.3.4]:25" for
in/out filters, but for post-data, it returns just the IP add
Mike Harrington a écrit :
> Just checked, filters don't appear to be executing on Windows / Pre07.
Here, on Linux, "DATA=EFILTER" entries are adding as usual in the
smtp log file.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a
Just checked, filters don't appear to be executing on Windows / Pre07.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Quarta 28 Junho 2006 12:04, John Kielkopf escreveu:
> While I have yet to do it, I was thinking about accomplishing this by
> copying the message (@@FILE), with Xmail's "<>" and
> everything before it stripped, to the appropriate folder (after first
> checking that the folder exists), and then
Thank you very much for all replies about my question.
I got the idea of using @@FILE to move the message and now I'm writting a
program (in freepascal) that will read per domain filter rules and actions
from a mysql table.
Helio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail
.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: "Helio Cavichiolo Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: [xmail] filters
>
> Sorry to repost, but how nobody answered, I supposed my explanation or my
> English wasn't t
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 23:04, John Kielkopf wrote:
> Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
> > Sorry to repost, but how nobody answered, I supposed my explanation or
> > my English wasn't that clear.
> >
> > I'm using xmail with courier-imap and this is working fine.
> > I also included spamassassin to fi
Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
> Sorry to repost, but how nobody answered, I supposed my explanation or my
> English wasn't that clear.
>
> I'm using xmail with courier-imap and this is working fine.
> I also included spamassassin to filter spams, and this is also working fine.
> Now, I would like me
Sorry to repost, but how nobody answered, I supposed my explanation or my
English wasn't that clear.
I'm using xmail with courier-imap and this is working fine.
I also included spamassassin to filter spams, and this is also working fine.
Now, I would like messages marked as spam to be delivered
Hello,
Is there a way to make xmail deliver messages in another directory (inside
home dir) depending on filters?
Thanks
Helio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help&
will stop - quite a difference.
>So I'm assuming that you check for bit 5 to be on, to stop the filters.
>Probably a logical "AND 16" or "AND 0x10".
Can I suggest that the next version of xMail limit its errcode
interpretation to the published numbers of 0,3,4,5,
is not looking for.
>
> I had this scary thought that, like DOS cmd file, the errcode is true when
> the value is equal OR higher.
>
> So I checked the xMail doco and it clearly states the if the filter does not
> return 4,5,6 (and I assume 20,21,22) the message continues.
>
sing stops and the email is
delivered.
Having a think about your errcode logic...
You document that you can add 16 to the errcode to "stop filter list
processing"
So I'm assuming that you check for bit 5 to be on, to stop the filters.
Probably a logical "AND 16" or "
rcode is true when
the value is equal OR higher.
So I checked the xMail doco and it clearly states the if the filter does not
return 4,5,6 (and I assume 20,21,22) the message continues.
"If all filters return values different from '6, 5 and 4' the message
continues its trip."
I
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Dan Porter wrote:
> I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
> not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
>
> I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
> something li
On 08.09.2005 17:54, Dan Porter wrote:
> I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
> not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
>
> I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
> something lik
I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
something like this:
In filters.in.tab:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "*"
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
>Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 1:31 AM
>To: xmail@xmailserver.org
>Subject: [xmail] Re: filters in/filters out chain question
>Davide wrote:
>"I can already hear
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> What you really want is the ability to have smtp-in, smtp-out, and pop3-in
> filters.
> That way you can deal with the incoming mail before it is fanned-out to the
> individual recipients - this is also why you are getting 4 executions of
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Please, correct me if i'm wrong :
>
> On incoming mail xmail make decision to run IN filters or OUT filters on
> 'final' recipient local or not.
>
> Now, suppose a local user [EMAIL PROTECTED] that have a have a mai
What you really want is the ability to have smtp-in, smtp-out, and pop3-in
filters.
That way you can deal with the incoming mail before it is fanned-out to the
individual recipients - this is also why you are getting 4 executions of
your filters.
In a way you already have this - an 'in-se
Hello Davide
Please, correct me if i'm wrong :
On incoming mail xmail make decision to run IN filters or OUT filters on
'final' recipient local or not.
Now, suppose a local user [EMAIL PROTECTED] that have a have a mailproc.tab for
this user that redirect to multiple accounts :
Correction :
Read 'HELO' or 'EHLO' data !! (not date ...)
> Lastly (at this time ;-) : Nor the first line in the spool file, nor
> filters/external commands @@ parameters can return the 'HELO'
> or 'EHLO' date
data
> send b
At 10.39 27/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Davide and list
>XMail doc in sections for filters (in and out) and smtp filters (in and out)
>says that first line in the spool file passed to filters is as this :
>
>ClientDomain;ClientIP;ClientPort;ServerDomain;ServerIP;ServerPort
> The filter docs need some revision, for sure (I assume you're
> using version
> 1.21).
>
Yes 1.21
>
> What you report seems to be the first line of the spool files
> stored in the
> queue. The docs say that the format of the @@FILE passed to
> SMTP filte
At 10.39 27/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Davide and list
>XMail doc in sections for filters (in and out) and smtp filters (in and out)
>says that first line in the spool file passed to filters is as this :
>
>ClientDomain;ClientIP;ClientPort;ServerDomain;ServerIP;ServerPort
Correction :
Read 'HELO' or 'EHLO' data !! (not date ...)
> Lastly (at this time ;-) : Nor the first line in the spool file, nor
> filters/external commands @@ parameters can return the 'HELO'
> or 'EHLO' date
data
> send b
Hello Davide and list
I'm confused !
XMail doc in sections for filters (in and out) and smtp filters (in and out)
says that first line in the spool file passed to filters is as this :
ClientDomain;ClientIP;ClientPort;ServerDomain;ServerIP;ServerPort;Time;Logo
(Note that no info on first li
At 20.53 03/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
>Francesco Vertova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The (unrelated) question is: a "ListSender"[tab]"" in user.tab sets an
> > empty MAIL FROM:<> in delivering to ML users without changing the mail
> > headers (much
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Francesco Vertova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The (unrelated) question is: a "ListSender"[tab]"" in user.tab sets an
> empty MAIL FROM:<> in delivering to ML users without changing the mail
> headers (much like "NoSenderBounce" in server.tab and unli
Hi all,
for those of you who are wondering why /domain>$/ may not match a @@FILE's
4th line: the SMTP filters docs should say
MAIL FROM:<...>[ SIZE=...] [ 4th line ]
rather than
MAIL FROM:<...> [ 4th line ]
Apparently, the line holds the peer's MAIL FROM comm
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have testing SMTP Filters (clients sending messages from my smtp server).
>
> I have inserted the line script at FILTERS.PRE-DATA.TAB only, but my script
> is executing at all inbound messages (as if i had inserted i
Hi,
I have testing SMTP Filters (clients sending messages from my smtp server).
I have inserted the line script at FILTERS.PRE-DATA.TAB only, but my script
is executing at all inbound messages (as if i had inserted in
filters.in.tab), when the message is inbound and not is a smtp session, the
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Davide
>
> I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
> pass to my filter application.
> It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
> (@@REMOTESERVERADDR f
Hi Davide
I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
pass to my filter application.
It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
(@@REMOTESERVERADDR for example) ?
thanks ;-)
Ana Paula Fernandes
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The @@REMOTEADDR is returning the IP of client, i need the IP of smtp server
> of client, or i don't right?
??!?? [EMAIL PROTECTED](^@(!
There are two IPs in a TCP/IP connection. One if the peer IP (remote host)
and the other one is the host IP
The @@REMOTEADDR is returning the IP of client, i need the IP of smtp server
of client, or i don't right?
thanks
lascjr
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 5:12 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Server IP Address at Inbound Filters
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Davide
>
> I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
> pass to my filter application.
> It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
> (@@REMOTESERVERADDR f
Hi Davide
I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
pass to my filter application.
It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
(@@REMOTESERVERADDR for example) ?
thanks ;-)
lascjr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
in32 process and call that
process from XMail. With any luck, maybe XMail will someday have =
options
for hooking into dll based filters and then I can recompile my filters =
as a
dll file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
Yes, there is a client called clamdscan that can call clamd. ClamD can =
stay
running. However, that does not reduce the number of processes running.
The same number of processes would need to be launched per email,
VC++, and then merging the SpamC and client =
AV
code into that one VC++ project. That would reduce the number of =
launched
processes to one per email hit, which would be a huge improvement over =
my
existing solution. Then if/when there are dll hooks for filters in =
XMail, I
could quickly
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shiloh Jennings
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
I admit some performance is currently lost on Cygwin. However, this is =
not
really what concer
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dario
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] R: Re: R: Re: RE: Re: Spam Filters
Hi Jason,
I admit I can be wrong about decoding with f-prot's latest release,
seems like fpcmd grew quite a lot in size since 3.14 a
, launching
another process is not nearly as much of a performance cost. The =
existing
filter design would be fine under Linux, even though it suffers under
Windows. What I would love to see on the XMail build for Windows is an
option to use dll files instead of launching processes for the filters. =
If
originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Jason J. Ellingson
Inviato: venerdi 5 novembre 2004 14.57
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: [xmail] Re: R: Re: RE: Re: Spam Filters
Glad to hear from you Dario! Your code was the inspiration for mine. So I
value your input a lot.
Per
te
some bullet-proof anti-virus and anti-spam filters!
Jason J Ellingson
Technical Consultant
615.301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis
www.ellingson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
it and the creator's web site is
history is seems. Don Drake's original sa_filter.pl on SA3.0 works
brilliantly though.
- Original Message -
From: "Dario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:34 AM
Subject: [xmail]
can use 2 scanners, one after the other.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Rosario Pingaro
Inviato: venerdì 5 novembre 2004 13.50
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: [xmail] Re: R: Re: RE: Re: Spam Filters
Dariomm
does the f-prot for windows
, 2004 7:34 AM
Subject: [xmail] R: Re: RE: Re: Spam Filters
> Just a few suggestions
>
> I have a spamc port for windows that will work without cygwin.
> http://www.henry.it/xmail (look for xspamc)
> I'm using it with spamd on linux (cause of razor, dcc ...) but I have
> inst
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Jason J. Ellingson
Inviato: venerdi 5 novembre 2004 5.56
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
Looked at everything...
Basically, both are CygWin. The SpamC you are using is using CygWin.dll to
run...
With that setup, you'
Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
Cygwin for CLamAV and a native Win32 compile of SpamC.
Windows CLamAV:
http://clamav.or.id/
Windows SpamC:
http://www.my-mueller.com/projects/sa_win32/distr/spamc-2.55-bin-cygwin.z=
. I am a huge fan of ClamAV at this point.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
I take it that you must
0:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
Yes, and it works great. This email was sent through one of our Windows
2003 Web Edition servers running XMail 1.20. We run ClamAV and SpamC on =
the
Windows boxes. We have a cluster of 10 FreeBSD boxe
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Wim Verveen
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
> I bother with the SuSE box as I know I'll probably move
esday, November 03, 2004 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
I'm surprised. I manage an XMail on Windows 2000 Server and an XMail on a
SuSE Linux Pro 9.1 box as well.
So far, I've had no problems having them both work... all the config stuff
ur xmailserver.
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jason J. Ellingson
> Verzonden: donderdag 4 november 2004 0:43
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: [****SPAM] RE: Re: Spam Filters
>=20
> I'm surprised. I ma
gson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey L. Conley
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: [****SPAM****] RE: Re: Spam Filters
Thanks but I think I am going to just buil
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPAM] [xmail] RE: [xmail] Re: Spam Filters
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar
what you want and I can make it happen.
- Jason
- Original Message -
From:Jeffrey L. Conley +ADw-jeff45-70+AEA-identerprises.net+AD4-
Subject: +AFs-xmail+AF0- Re: Spam Filters
Date:Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:45:04 -06:00
Where can I find a copy of this filter?
-Original Message
Where can I find a copy of this filter?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Spam Filters
Do you need a full blown SpamAssassin on
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Spam Filters
Go to www.xmailserver.org, there are two that should run fine since
you're probably running Perl for Win as well. I've used them both but
currently use the bsa_filter.pl so forwarding/deleting can be done.
>>> [EMAIL P
: [xmail] Spam Filters
Does any one have a working SpamAssassin filter for windows?
Any help would be appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the
Go to www.xmailserver.org, there are two that should run fine since
you're probably running Perl for Win as well. I've used them both but
currently use the bsa_filter.pl so forwarding/deleting can be done.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/3/2004 11:16:17 AM >>>
Does any one have a working SpamAssassin fil
Does any one have a working SpamAssassin filter for windows?
Any help would be appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reason following line doesn't work:
>"MyFilter.pl"[TAB]@@FILE...
>
>even though .pl is correctly associated with perl.exe and executing
>MyFilter.pl from a command line works as expected.
In order to run an interpreted script on Windows you have to put the
interpreter as the
> "c:\perl\bin\perl.exe"[TAB]"MyFilter.pl"[TAB]"@@FILE"...
This is what worked for me in the past.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The docs says following about the syntax in FILTERS.POST-DATA.TAB:
"command"[TAB]"arg-or-macro"[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
If I wan to run a perl script (on Windows)should the "command" be:
"c:\perl\bin\perl.exe"[TAB]"MyFilter.pl"[TAB]@@FILE...
or
"c:\perl\bin\perl.exe MyFilter.pl"[TAB]@@FILE...
for some
At 13:38 3.9.2004 +0200, you wrote:
>I'm trying to implement the pyspf filter...
>But i seem to have no luck (if that has anything to do with it.)
>
>Is there anyway you can monitor the mails path through the server?
>I cant find anything in the logs about the mail being processed by any
>filter or
I'm trying to implement the pyspf filter...
But i seem to have no luck (if that has anything to do with it.)
Is there anyway you can monitor the mails path through the server?
I cant find anything in the logs about the mail being processed by any
filter or if the filter failed or...
nothing...
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
> messages for SPAM (if only there was a way to prevent mail from being
> scanned twice).
Add an header in the message.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> is it possible to filter out RCPT TO lines in a SMTP filter (if there are
> more then one lines) so that I can change the recipient list?
>
>
>
> >>>Yes. I need to check what happens if you leave th
>Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
>some
>mails when spamd is too busy.
>
>http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
>http://xmail.beaucox.com/
Hmmm...how did i miss sa_filter2? I've been watching the list pretty
closely -- I must have missed it b
>Toby Reiter pravi:
>> All,
>> I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not
>> always get caught by SpamAssassin. Does anyone have a similar
>> experience? Does anyone have any hints about why this might happen?
>> I'm using the Drake's SA_Filter, which works absolutely bea
ECTED] Im Auftrag von Toby Reiter
> Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2004 00:11
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [xmail] Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?
>=20
>=20
> All,
> I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not=20
> always get caught by SpamAssass
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
