Re: [yocto] [autobuilder][PATCH 0/3] ease send-qa-email usage with older history

2023-02-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 15:12 +0100, Alexis Lothoré via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Hello, > this minor patch series bring minor fixes into send-qa-email to ease > development/debugging in it: > - fetching current build test results works well in CI builds because we are > sure that the build r

Re: [yocto] [autobuilder][PATCH 0/3] ease send-qa-email usage with older history

2023-02-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 15:52 +0100, Alexis Lothoré wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On 2/7/23 15:42, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 15:12 +0100, Alexis Lothoré via > > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > I assumed that no tool is currently trying to parse

Re: [yocto] [meta-oe][dunfell]nativesdk-postgresql - causing chown: invalid user: 'postgres:postgres'

2023-02-09 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 00:05 -0800, alexander.roda...@brose.com wrote: > Hello, > > i am trying to install the PostgreSQL and the development package > (postgresql-server-dev) as part of the SDK.  > > I added via bbappend BBCLASSEXTED_append = "nativesdk" to the > postgresql_12.9.bb.  > > I can b

Re: [yocto] [meta-oe][dunfell]nativesdk-postgresql - causing chown: invalid user: 'postgres:postgres'

2023-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 23:16 -0800, alexander.roda...@brose.com wrote: > I integrated the changes of the commit you posted, however i still > have the same error message coming up. Do i need to make changes in > the recipe to make the  intercept work? No, it should have changed PATH in the recipe a

Re: [yocto] AlmaLinux 8.5 support in Langdale

2023-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 09:12 +, Chaplin, Kris via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working with our team to test supported development OS for our > AMD/Xilinx PetaLinux distribution built on top of Langdale. The official > supported Linux distributions are Ubuntu, Fedora, AlmaLi

Re: [yocto] AlmaLinux 8.5 support in Langdale

2023-02-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 13:09 +, Chaplin, Kris via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Thanks Alex, > > > Note that the list of supported host distros is set only for the poky > > reference distro with a weak assignment, and not for oe-core or yocto > > as a whole. If you do your own tests, and they

Re: [yocto] Question about psuedo abort errors

2023-02-24 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 02:27 -0800, Tamis wrote: > I know that this might be an old thread but we seem to deal the exact > same issue in our yocto builds, that's why I am writing here. > Recently we switched from sumo yocto branch to dunfel. > Now some recipes with nothing special in it, just c

Re: [yocto] Question about psuedo abort errors

2023-03-05 Thread Richard Purdie
I saw you're still having problems even with the latest pseudo revisions. I'll make some comments below. On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 02:27 -0800, Tamis wrote: > Install error: > > + install -m 0644 > WORKDIR/lib32-las/M-WBS0.1-r0/git/lasiflib/include/lasif_l

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH 0/8] fix regression reports generation on "master-next" branches

2023-03-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2023-03-13 at 15:51 +0100, Alexis Lothoré via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > From: Alexis Lothoré > > This series fixes regression report generation on "next" branches, as raised > in > [1]. > > The first five patches are preparatory updates for the real fix, being either > refactoring

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH 2/2] scripts/generate-testresult-index.py: expose regression reports on web page

2023-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 10:00 +0100, Alexis Lothoré via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > From: Alexis Lothoré > > When available, expose tesresult-regressions-report.txt on non-release web > page, > as it is done for many other artifacts currently > > Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré > --- > script

[yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.2.rc1)

2023-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.2.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.2.rc1 Build hash information: bitbake: 46e1ea2e9a203992bb4de48ea21a8e736419ada2 meta-agl: 09135164a21a216c6e3e75d7decce896b92962f0 meta-arm: 3b4a

Re: [yocto] [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.2.rc1)

2023-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
riginal Message- > > From: qa-build-notificat...@lists.yoctoproject.org > notificat...@lists.yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of Richard Purdie > > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 3:57 PM > > To: > > Cc: qa-build-notification > > Subject: [qa-build-notification] QA no

[yocto] 4.2 release going to rc3

2023-04-22 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, Whilst we had a green QA report and were thinking rc2 would release, we did get a user report of problems with graphics on qemu and sato was inoperable (bug 15100). Sadly our QA automation doesn't catch an issue like this and it mustn't have shown on real hardware. Due to the nature of the b

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Community Manager updates

2023-05-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 16:40 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > After five years, I have decided to resign from my position as the > Yocto Project Community Manager. I joined the OpenEmbedded community > around 2008. I have fond memories of my early days, and still > remember some of my first interact

Re: [yocto] repost: how to create a SPDX "notice file" from a build?

2019-11-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 09:59 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 11/22/19 9:03 AM, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > /// end / > > > > i have absolutely no idea what to think of this, and am open to > > suggestions. does an

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for yocto-3.0.1.rc3

2019-12-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 07:15 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > This is the full report for 3.0.1 RC3: > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > === Summary > No high milestone defects. > No new defects are found in this

Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for yocto-3.0.1.rc3

2019-12-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 17:07 +, Ross Burton wrote: > On 03/12/2019 15:15, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 07:15 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > > This is the full report for 3.0.1 RC3: > > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testre

Re: [yocto] variable and task/function timing

2019-12-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 10:39 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Wed 2019-12-11 @ 11:06:44 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > +python do_check_build_type() { > > > +_buildtype = d.getVar('MESA_BUILD_TYPE') > > > +if _buildtype not in ['release', 'debug']: > > > +

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.1_M1.rc8)

2019-12-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 03:32 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Hello all, > > This is the full report for 3.1_M1.rc8: > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > > === Summary > No high milestone defects. > No new defect

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.1_M1.rc8)

2019-12-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 07:38 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > On 12/18/19 2:46 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 03:32 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > This is the full report for 3.1_M1.rc8: > > >

Re: [yocto] SSTATE_MIRRORS with ssh/sftp fetchers #yocto

2019-12-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 02:37 -0800, angeal1...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Recently, I tried to use the SSTATE_MIRRORS variable to get back > sstate cache from a build machine shared amongst developers. > When I tried with the simple FILE fetcher, it worked great and > resumed the work wher

Re: [yocto] poky: no submodule mapping found in .gitmodules for path 'documentation/bitbake'

2020-01-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 12:55 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote: > Hi Scott, Richard, > I'm experiencing weird git submodule behaviour on poky master since > commit 7e7b066085 ("YP 3.1 Docs: Updated Manual revision tables.") > > Was this intended? No, it wasn't. Scott is unavailable right now so I've re

Re: [yocto] mailing list mangling name?

2020-01-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 08:01 +, André Draszik wrote: > On a related note, > > It appears groups.io is generating a new Message-Id header: > > Message-Id: <15e914a621406cc1.15...@lists.yoctoproject.org> > X-Orig-Message-Id: < > f868f741ae07674cb99e2b0c4ea6f7621ca16474.ca...@andred.net> > > Is

Re: [yocto] Switching to OpenSSL 1.1.1 in Yocto Morty release

2020-01-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 15:50 +0200, Nikolay Merinov via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > Our company interested in updating an old Yocto releases (especially > the Morty release) to use the OpenSSL version 1.1.1. > > Can Yocto Project integrate all necessary changes if Inango prepares > all required

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper v2 1/3] config: don't run meta-intel in qemu yet

2020-01-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 06:50 +, Mittal, Anuj wrote: > Can this be merged in zeus/warrior too please? I've merged to zeus but this code isn't in warrior at all... Cheers, Richard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#47966): https://l

Re: [yocto] patchtest licensing

2020-01-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 20:07 +, Paul Barker wrote: > Hey folks, > > I've started looking through patchtest & patchtest-oe in detail and > spotted that all the scripts, support code and test cases are > licensed > under GPLv2. Is that ok given that we plan to copy this into > openembedded-core (

Re: [yocto] [oe] [RFC PATCH] python: remove Python 2 and all supporting classes

2020-01-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 14:16 +, Ross Burton wrote: > Python 2 ceased being maintained on the 1st January 2020. We've > already > removed all users of it from oe-core so the final step is to move the > recipe and supporting classes to meta-python2. > > The following are removed in this commit:

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] mc: Drop python2 scripts

2020-01-18 Thread Richard Purdie
python2 is now EOL. To keep this old version of mc going, delete the python2 scripts to avoid the dependency. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- recipes-extended/mc/mc_4.7.5.2.bb | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-extended/mc/mc_4.7.5.2.bb b

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] shared-mime-info: Add 1.10 from OE-Core

2020-01-18 Thread Richard Purdie
Later versions of shared-mime-info need itstool which is GPLv3. Add an old version of shared-mime-info to allow gplv3 free builds to suceed. Use python to set PREFERRED_VERSION based on INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE to control this. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- conf/layer.conf

Re: [yocto] [RFC PATCH] python: remove Python 2 and all supporting classes

2020-01-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 13:28 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:15 PM Andreas Müller < > schnitzelt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:35 PM Khem Raj > > wrote: > > > On 1/17/20 6:16 AM, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > Python 2 ceased being maintained on the 1st January

Re: [yocto] [psplash][PATCH 1/3] add recovered bar.png

2020-01-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 14:31 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > Hi list, hi Ross, > > We still carry this downstream, any chance to get them still merged > in > psplash? > > If it is really considered unmaintained, then we probably should drop > the psplash recipe altogether? I've just merged them, sor

Re: [yocto] [psplash][PATCH 1/3] add recovered bar.png

2020-01-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 22:48 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2020-01-20 17:14, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 14:31 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > > > Hi list, hi Ross, > > > > > > We still carry this downstream, any chance to get them still

Re: [yocto] [psplash][PATCH] add systemd support

2020-01-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 23:00 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > From: Stefan Agner > > This adds optional systemd support. When enabled, an utility called > psplash-systemd is built. This tool will connect to systemd using the > system bus to obtain progress information and communicate that to > psplash

Re: [yocto] [psplash][PATCH v2] add systemd support

2020-01-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 11:07 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > From: Stefan Agner > > This adds optional systemd support. When enabled, an utility called > psplash-systemd is built. This tool will connect to systemd using the > system bus to obtain progress information and communicate that to > psplash

Re: [yocto] using d.expand() in a python function

2020-01-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 13:55 +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > I have a do_configure() python function which is essentially > > python do_configure() { > import fileinput > with open("foo.txt", "w") as out: > for line in > fileinput.input(files=d.getVar("FOO_INPUT").split()): >

Re: [yocto] using d.expand() in a python function

2020-01-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 15:46 +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 22/01/2020 15.35, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Bitbake can only detect direct references to variables. The code > > above only runs at configure time, not at parse time so its not > > really surprising that bitbak

Re: [yocto] using d.expand() in a python function

2020-01-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 16:39 +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 22/01/2020 16.50, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 15:46 +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > On 22/01/2020 15.35, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > Bitbake can only detect direct references

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] native/cross/nativesdk: Drop obsolete do_populate_sysroot[stamp-extra-info]

2020-01-26 Thread Richard Purdie
With recipe specific sysroot, these settings do nothing. Drop the obsolete code. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/classes/cross.bbclass | 1 - meta/classes/crosssdk.bbclass | 1 - meta/classes/native.bbclass| 1 - meta/classes/nativesdk.bbclass | 1 - 4 files changed, 4 deletions

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] l3afpad: Add missing mime-xdg inherit

2020-01-26 Thread Richard Purdie
Fixes: WARNING: l3afpad-0.8.18.1.11+gitAUTOINC+3cdccdc950-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: package contains desktop file with key 'MimeType' but does not inhert mime-xdg: l3afpad path 'XXX/packages-split/l3afpad/usr/share/applications/l3afpad.desktop' [mime-xdg] Signed-of

[yocto] [PATCH] distrodata/maintainers: Add PARSE_ALL_RECIPES flag to fix test issues

2020-01-27 Thread Richard Purdie
out a bit (more cleanup can follow). Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/classes/base.bbclass | 4 ++-- meta/classes/features_check.bbclass| 3 +++ meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py | 7 +++ 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a

[yocto] [PATCH] conf/machine: Remove mpc8315e-rdb machine

2020-01-29 Thread Richard Purdie
: Richard Purdie --- meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample | 1 - meta-yocto-bsp/README.hardware| 142 -- meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf | 36 - .../linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend| 2 - .../linux/linux-yocto_4.19.bbappend

Re: [yocto] Bitbake immediate assignment behavior

2020-01-30 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:32 +0200, Alexandru N. Onea wrote: > Let's consider the following example in a bb file: > > X = "1" > A := "X is '${X}' and Y is '${Y}'" > B = "X is '${X}' and Y is '${Y}'" > X = "2" > Y = "3" > > According to the bitbake user manual, section 3.1.7 [1], the expected

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] config.py: remove mpc8315-rdb

2020-01-31 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 16:19 -0800, akuster wrote: > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- > config.py | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/config.py b/config.py > index 7dbd5e7..b210275 100644 > --- a/config.py > +++ b/config.py > @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ trigger_bu

[yocto] Sad news about Scott Rifenbark

2020-01-31 Thread Richard Purdie
I'm sorry to have to pass on the sad news that Scott Rifenbark, our tech writer for the project passed away on Wednesday after a battle with cancer. I remember interviewing Scott over 10 years ago when forming a team at Intel to work on what became the Yocto Project, he was with it from the start.

Re: [yocto] more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE

2020-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 13:48 -0500, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > ... snip ... > > which seems odd as there don't appear to be any other recipes that > > provide pkgconfig, and AIUI, the default provider for any recipe is > > the recipe with *exact

Re: [yocto] more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE

2020-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 13:31 -0500, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > (part of the nitpickiness of some of these questions stems from > that, in my updated courseware, i want to use actual examples out of, > say, the openembedded layer, and not just contrived examples > involving > packages like "foo

Re: [yocto] more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE

2020-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 13:31 -0500, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > (part of the nitpickiness of some of these questions stems from > that, in my updated courseware, i want to use actual examples out of, > say, the openembedded layer, and not just contrived examples > involving > packages like "foo

Re: [yocto] clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff)

2020-02-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 05:32 -0500, rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: > second, i think we all agree that it is rarely necessary to use > "PROVIDES +=", although i did run across one case in > recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc: > > PROVIDES = "virtual/libc" > PROVIDES += "virtual/libintl virtual/libico

Re: [yocto] yocto.io: Add weekly full tests on master branch?

2020-02-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 12:08 -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: > Hi, > > There are many tests run for master-next and reported here: > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/ > such as: > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20200214-4/testresults/testresult-report.txt > > It would

Re: [yocto] yocto.io: Add weekly full tests on master branch?

2020-02-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 17:14 +, Richard Purdie via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 12:08 -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are many tests run for master-next and reported here: > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/p

Re: [yocto] master/master-next missing from poky repo?

2020-02-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 11:41 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Something is wrong, as master and master-next are missing here? > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/ There is something wrong with the http caching on the git server. The branches are there, they're just not appearing immed

Re: [yocto] Creating a build system which can scale. #yocto

2020-02-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 04:27 -0800, philip.le...@domino-uk.com wrote: > Something using the built-in cache mirror in Yocto–there are a few > ways it can do this, as it’s essentially a file share somewhere. > https://pelux.io/2017/06/19/How-to-create-a-shared-sstate-dir.html > for an example shows h

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW07'20

2020-02-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 17:44 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 17:10, wrote: > > With the git infrastructure issue updated, we now have centos8 > > workers added to the autobuilder. > > > > What are the current plans for centos 7? Project members are keen to see support f

Re: [yocto] Debugging gdb built by Yocto

2020-02-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote: > Does anybody have any tips or tricks for how I might debug the > (cross-canadian) gdb built by Yocto's SDK? > > I need to add some printf's to the gdb code to help track down why > something isn't working, but none of my traditional > get-r

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)

2020-02-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:41 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > On 2/18/20 11:33 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This is the full report for yocto-3.0.2.rc2: > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > > > === Summary

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW07'20

2020-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 07:46 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Planned upcoming dot releases: > YP 2.7.3 built and in QA > > I didn’t see any notification for this build. Am I missing something? No, its due to be built but isn't built yet! I think that was meant to say 3.0.2, sorry about any confu

Re: [yocto] Bitbake returning non-zero due to sstate errors

2020-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 11:26 +, Paul Barker wrote: > In my new CI setup I'm using an sstate mirror which seems to have > some > occasional download issues. This results in the setscene task > failing. > For example: > > ERROR: qt3d-5.13.2+gitAUTOINC+93361f1a59-r0 > do_package_write_ipk_setscene

Re: [yocto] Bitbake returning non-zero due to sstate errors

2020-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 11:59 +, Paul Barker wrote: > I'm now looking into this... > > In sstate_checkhashes() we mark sstate as available if > fetcher.checkstatus() succeeds. Then at a later point > sstate_setscene() calls sstate_installpkg() calls pstaging_fetch() > calls fetcher.download() to

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)

2020-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
I discussed this quickly in bug triage today with Armin. We agreed that: * The openssh bug is minor and doesn't affect release * Anuj resolved one of the bugs as being execution error so again it doesn't affect release * The bash issue does affect release We're proposing we build and release an r

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)

2020-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 10:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:44:24PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > ... > > This would also include the bitbake memory optimisation during > > parsing > > which merged. > > ... > > I would consider th

Re: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)

2020-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 17:26 +, Tummalapalli, Vineela wrote: > [Vineela]: So we will have 3.0.2.rc3 as the release candidate and not > 3.0.2.rc2 as we see issues with that. Am I correct? > If so, in terms of release process I just have to redo the things > like staging 3.0.2.rc3 and do the relea

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] yocto-bsps: update to v5.4.20

2020-02-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 18:10 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Updating the SRCREVs for the h/w references to v5.4.20, which includes > the binutils fix for perf. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield > --- > .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.4.bbappend

Re: [yocto] Building CentOS based filesystem #yocto

2020-02-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 08:15 -0800, bill.k...@azuresummit.com wrote: > Hello! I am currently using Yocto with default Poky distro. A > customer would like a CentOS-based filesystem, and I am wondering if > this is possible using Yocto? > > My initial thought is to imitate > https://github.com/me

Re: [yocto] Should changing a task in the .bb file cause the task to be rerun?

2020-02-28 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 22:51 +, Sean McKay wrote: > This is probably a fairly short question (I hope): > I’m working on a branch based on zeus. I found a bug in the way that > one of our recipes was handling something during do_configure (which > caused an error to pop up in a do_compile task).

[yocto] Yocto Project Long Term Support (LTS) Announced

2020-03-03 Thread Richard Purdie
Its posted at: https://www.yoctoproject.org/yocto-project-long-term-support-announced/ but I'll copy it below since this is an important announcement """ To fulfill the evolving requirements of its members and users, the Yocto Project announced a new plan to extend support for selected releases. T

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09'20

2020-03-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:00 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 16:59, wrote: > > coreutils ptest blocked on libmodule-build-perl reproducibility > > issue > > > > I sent a patch for this. Thanks! Just FYI I think there may also be a couple of other packages coreutils pulls

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09'20

2020-03-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 22:53 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 23:42, Richard Purdie < > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Just FYI I think there may also be a couple of other packages > > coreutils > > pulls in and they may al

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09'20

2020-03-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 16:58 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 22:53 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 23:42, Richard Purdie < > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > Just FYI I think there may also

Re: [yocto] Should changing a task in the .bb file cause the task to be rerun?

2020-03-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 11:33 +, mikko.rap...@bmw.de wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:25:59PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 22:51 +, Sean McKay wrote: > > > This is probably a fairly short question (I hope): > > > I’m working on a bran

Re: [yocto] git fetcher: does not execute git fetch --tags or similar when HEAD has not changed

2020-03-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 14:55 +0100, Matthias Schoepfer via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > We have noticed the following issue: We keep the versions of out > software by means of tags on the git repositories, i.e. during the > build, somethings like git describe --tags gets called. In yocto, > ou

Re: [yocto] What are the key factors for yocto build speed?

2020-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 08:05 +, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Once this is done, IO still happens when anything calls sync() and > fsync() and worst offenders are package management tools. In yocto > builds, package manager actions to flush to disk are always useless > since rootfs images are going to b

Re: [yocto] What are the key factors for yocto build speed?

2020-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 11:43 +, mikko.rap...@bmw.de wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:04:26AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Recipe parsing should hit 100% CPU, its one of the few places we > > can do > > that. > > I'm not fully aware what bitbake doe

Re: [yocto] What are the key factors for yocto build speed?

2020-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 17:29 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > Le jeu. 19 mars 2020 à 17:07, Mike Looijmans a > écrit : > > On 19-03-2020 12:04, Richard Purdie via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > > >> , fetch, configure, package and rootfs tasks. > > >

Re: [yocto] What are the key factors for yocto build speed?

2020-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 19:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 05:07:17PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote: > > ... > > With both parallelization options > > to "16", I might end up with 16 compile tasks running 16 compile > > threads > > each, i.e. 256 running processes. > > ... > > T

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.rc1)

2020-04-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 22:53 +, Poky Build User wrote: > A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.rc1) was completed on the > autobuilder and is available at: > > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.rc1 I haven't see any "started QA" email about this yet. We have had some issu

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.rc1)

2020-04-08 Thread Richard Purdie
s some issues. > > I will now start the QA on > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.rc2/ > > Thanks, > Sangeeta > > > > -Original Message- > > From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org > > On Behalf > > Of Richard Purdie >

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.rc2)

2020-04-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 04:01 +, pokybu...@localhost.yoctoproject.org wrote: > A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.rc2) was completed on the > autobuilder and is available at: > > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.rc2 > > > Build hash information: > > bitbake: 4618da20

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][zeus][PATCH] config.json: Override BBTARGETS for meta-intel

2020-04-09 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 09:54 +0800, mohamad.noor.alim.hus...@intel.com wrote: > From: Mohamad Noor Alim Hussin > > Using meta-intel with core-image-sato-(sdk)-ptest > results in a hddimg size of more than 4 GB. Remove > that image type from testing. > > hddimg is not built by default in dunfell s

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.rc2)

2020-04-14 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Sangeeta/Vineela, On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 07:26 +, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > This is the full report for yocto-3.1.rc2: > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > === Summary > No high milestone defects. > No new

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.rc2)

2020-04-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 16:05 -0700, akuster wrote: > > > On 4/15/20 3:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Release notes draft attached, including a dedication to Scott > > (wasn't sure where to put that so I've just left it at the top) and > > contributors list. Let me know if you notice anything > >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 2/2] scripts/send-qa-email: fix bug in git push logic for yocto-testresults

2020-04-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 14:43 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > We were mistakenly doing a force push if the branch was in either > BUILD_HISTORY_FORKPUSH or BUILD_HISTORY_DIRECTPUSH. > > Now we force push for branches in BUILD_HISTORY_FORKPUSH, regular push > for branches in BUILD_HISTORY_DIRECTPUSH, a

Re: [yocto] Can not use wildcard in SRC_URI to apply patches #yocto

2020-04-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 17:30 +0900, Hao Qian wrote: > However, if I change files' name into wildcard in SRC_URI like: > === > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" > SRC_URI += "file://*" > === [...] > Could any

Re: [yocto] Can not use wildcard in SRC_URI to apply patches #yocto

2020-04-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 08:24 +0900, Hao Qian wrote: > Hi, Richard > > Thanks for replying. > > Yes, it makes sense why patches not be applied by using wildcard. > > Just for confirmation, it looks like more than one person made it to > use wildcard for patching as below: > https://stackoverflow.c

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] disable-gplv3.inc: Disable glib-2.0 ptest python3-dbusmock dependency

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
The newly added dependency on python3-dbusmock in OE-Core is GPLv3 and would fail to work with this layer. Remove it in the config for enabling the layer. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/conf/distro

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] conf/distro: Add disable-gplv3.inc

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
ilder config used for this testing this layer. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) create mode 100644 conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc diff --git a/conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc b/conf/distro/include/disable-

[yocto] [meta-gplv2] [PATCH 1/3] conf/distro: Add disable-gplv3.inc

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
ilder config currently used for testing meta-gplv2. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) create mode 100644 conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc diff --git a/conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc b/conf/distro/include/di

[yocto] [meta-gplv2] [PATCH 2/3] disable-gplv3.inc: Disable glib-2.0 ptest python3-dbusmock dependency

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
The newly added dependency on python3-dbusmock in OE-Core is GPLv3 and would fail to work with this layer. Remove it in the config for enabling the layer. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- conf/distro/include/disable-gplv3.inc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/conf/distro

[yocto] [meta-gplv2] [PATCH 3/3] README: Document how to configure repo for sending patches

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- README | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/README b/README index 4558a99..6a61331 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -27,3 +27,8 @@ intended target branch of the Git repository. Git repository: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi

Re: [yocto] [meta-gplv2] [PATCH 3/3] README: Document how to configure repo for sending patches

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 12:01 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie > --- > README | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/README b/README > index 4558a99..6a61331 100644 > --- a/README > ++

Re: [yocto] oddities(?) when appending to an override

2020-05-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 16:28 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i bring this up because i've run across occasional examples of that > in the code base -- here's > meta-gnome/recipes-connectivity/libnma/libnma_1.8.28.bb: > > EXTRA_OEMESON_mipsarchn32_append = " -Dvapi=false" > > is that deliberat

Re: [yocto] [matchbox-desktop-2][PATCH] Add SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later

2020-05-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 11:53 -0400, Matthew wrote: > Fixes [YOCTO #13319] > > Signed-off-by: Mingde (Matthew) Zeng > --- > libtaku/inotify/inotify-diag.c| 2 ++ > libtaku/inotify/inotify-diag.h| 2 ++ > libtaku/inotify/inotify-kernel.c | 2 ++ > libtaku/inotify/inotify-kernel.h | 2 ++ >

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.4.rc2)

2020-05-27 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Bill, On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 12:31 +, Mills, William wrote: > In a script, how would I download all the files in this dir: > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-2.7.4.rc2/machines/beaglebone-yocto/ > > I see no global md5sum (or sha256sum etc) file in the tree anywhere. > >

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.4.rc2)

2020-05-28 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 00:28 -0400, William Mills via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > On 5/27/20 6:42 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > > I've rebuilt the fancyindex module and enabled it. The full filenames > > are displayed now. The module is disabled automatically when new > > versions of EPEL ar

Re: [yocto] devtool modify issues with ubuntu 20 and fedora core 32

2020-06-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 11:06 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I'm not sure if this is distro specific. _PYTHON_SYSCONFIGDATA_NAME > is set from python3native.bbclass so that native python can pick up > target configuration, and if the target configuration is not there > (it comes with target python

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper]scripts/publish-artefacts: Fix for Bug 13947:Change checksum file extension from sha256sum to sha256

2020-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 20:12 +, Vineela wrote: > From: Vineela Tummalapalli > > > --- > scripts/publish-artefacts | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/publish-artefacts b/scripts/publish-artefacts > index 6ed922a..3ef7206 100755 > --- a/script

Re: [yocto] how crippled is ruby support in YP 3.0?

2020-06-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 14:19 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > background: trying to get ruby and a number of ruby gems migrated > from "morty" to "zeus", and nothing but grief trying to > compile/install ruby gems. > > plan A: start with standard YP layers all checked out to "zeus", > and > add

Re: [yocto] how does "bitbake meta-toolchain" map to a particular "image" when generating SDK?

2020-07-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 15:24 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > Quoting Ross Burton : > > > On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 11:50, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > >however, one can also generate a standard SDK with the generic > > > (image-independent): > > > > > >$ bitbake meta-toolchain > > > > > > wh

Re: [yocto] Offline Build #yocto

2020-07-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 23:05 -0700, Amrun Nisha.R wrote: > I want to create a offline build using yocto. > > I have sources and downloads packages directory in which i can able to create > a successful bitbake. I have transferred those files to another system and > tried to build them in offline

Re: [yocto] Offline Build #yocto

2020-07-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 07:18 -0700, Amrun Nisha.R wrote: > For gnu-config-native-20150728, I have copied the git2 folder from > older build folder to new build folder. It is fixed now. > > But I'm getting do_fetch error for the ncurses and ncurses_native. I > have attached the log file for both pac

Re: [yocto] Adjusting Extensible SDK for build setup

2020-07-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 15:06 +, Monsees, Steven C (US) wrote: > > I am fairly new to the Yocto SDK build process, and am looking to > create an extensible SDK for one of our platforms. > > I am currently working with Rocko 2.4.1, in conjunction with > uninative release 1.9… > > My current

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >