serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Integrated: 8386325: The AttachListener does not do proper exception handling Serguei Spitsyn
• [External] : Fwd: Fwd: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to provide a full combined dump of all platform and virtual threads ([Thread.print] + [Thread.dump_to_file -format=json]). Egor Ushakov
• Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
• Integrated: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Leonid Mesnik
• [External] : [Discuss] Two-way SSL/TLS and JMXMP Matt Pavlovich
  • Re: [External] : [Discuss] Two-way SSL/TLS and JMXMP Alan Bateman
  • Re: [External] : [Discuss] Two-way SSL/TLS and JMXMP Matt Pavlovich
• Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Adam Sotona
• Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] ExE Boss
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Gui Cao
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Gui Cao
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Artem
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v5] Lutz Schmidt
• Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v4] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v4] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v4] Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 [v2] Leonid Mesnik
• Withdrawn: 8374838: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.management.* duke
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v6] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8311176: Allow to reliably disable gc for objects created with the debugger [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8311176: Allow to reliably disable gc for objects created with the debugger [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8311176: Allow to reliably disable gc for objects created with the debugger [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8311176: Allow to reliably disable gc for objects created with the debugger [v2] Chris Plummer
• Integrated: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8386124: Test serviceability/sa/TestG1HeapRegion.java failed: Address of G1HeapRegion does not match Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v5] David Holmes
• [jdk27] RFR: 8385723: Intermittent failure of serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspect.java Chris Plummer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385723: Intermittent failure of serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspect.java Kevin Walls
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385723: Intermittent failure of serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspect.java Chris Plummer
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8385723: Intermittent failure of serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspect.java Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8383879: assert(_cur_stack_depth == num_frames) failed: cur_stack_depth out of sync _cur_stack_depth: 9 num_frames: 10 Leonid Mesnik
• Integrated: 8385427: Make unified logging checks in tests tolerant of added spaces Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines [v5] Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v15] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Integrated: 8385661: jvmti/vthread/ThreadStateTest/ThreadStateTest.java triggers assert(f.pc() == _chunk->pc()) failed Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8311176: Allow to reliably disable gc for objects created with the debugger Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v4] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v3] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Christian Hagedorn
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v47] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v47] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v47] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v47] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8385427: Make unified logging checks in tests tolerant of added spaces [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385427: Make unified logging checks in tests tolerant of added spaces [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385427: Make unified logging checks in tests tolerant of added spaces [v4] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8385427: Make unified logging checks in tests tolerant of added spaces [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8384557: Allow configuration of the JVM's temporary directory on Linux [v2] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8340088: Stack tracing tests of sleeping thread should be more resilient to code changes Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8340088: Stack tracing tests of sleeping thread should be more resilient to code changes Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v3] Kevin Walls

• Later messages