serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v5] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v5] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v8] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v10] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v12] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v13] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v14] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v15] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v16] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v17] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v18] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v19] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v20] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v21] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v21] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v21] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v21] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v22] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v23] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v23] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v23] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v23] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v24] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v25] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v25] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v25] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v25] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v25] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v26] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v27] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v28] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v29] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v30] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v30] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v30] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v31] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v31] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v31] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8361099: Shenandoah: Improve heap lock contention by using CAS for memory allocation [v98] Xiaolong Peng
• Re: RFR: 8361099: Shenandoah: Improve heap lock contention by using CAS for memory allocation [v97] Xiaolong Peng
• Re: RFR: 8361099: Shenandoah: Improve heap lock contention by using CAS for memory allocation [v96] Xiaolong Peng
• Re: RFR: 8347009: Speed ​​up parseInt and parseLong [v29] Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373839: Disable JVM TI suspension during JNI critical regions [v3] David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v27] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8383709: Linux perf map should record individual stubs Benjamin Peterson
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v26] Serguei Spitsyn
• Integrated: 8382537: Invalid JDWP command set number or command number can result in crash Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8382537: Invalid JDWP command set number or command number can result in crash Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382537: Invalid JDWP command set number or command number can result in crash Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v2] Julian Waters
• Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8382338: Various serviceability agent tests fail on Linux x86_64 with LTO enabled [v4] Leonid Mesnik
• Integrated: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8383639: JConsole unnecessary classloading for MBean types Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Prasanta Sadhukhan
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v4] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v5] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v6] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v6] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8383637: JConsole should not render HTML in components where it could be confusing Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v3] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 [v2] Anton Artemov
• Integrated: 8377991: TestLimitsUpdating.java fails with runtime exception even after JDK-8370492 is fixed Casper Norrbin
• Re: RFR: 8377991: TestLimitsUpdating.java fails with runtime exception even after JDK-8370492 is fixed [v2] Casper Norrbin
• Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! [v2] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8376885: StressGetTotalGcCpuTimeDuringShutdown.java intermittently timed out Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376885: StressGetTotalGcCpuTimeDuringShutdown.java intermittently timed out SendaoYan
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Paul Sandoz
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v3] duke
• Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests [v2] Ekaterina Pavlova
• Re: RFR: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382548: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp-disable-tiered-compilation failed with Test failed! Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v25] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v25] Serguei Spitsyn

• Later messages