Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > All well and good, but what of the changes and testing I brought up? > Obsolete is the right commitment level, but putting back stuff that's > both untested and known to perform its basic functions in an incorrect > and harmful manner is unacceptable at any commitment level.
It will certainly be tested, including for Alan's 64-bit issue. Can you give more details on the bug you mentioned "...that prevents make install from working because of bogus name mangling..."? BugId? But we do not have resources to make any kind of significant changes - the support model will be "Managed support (ie the community sustains the product)". We can leave chunks out, if desired (eg Stefan suggested ltdl, although I think something in JDS needs this), but otherwise the proposal is to build, test and ship the community version, with appropriate stability notifications, etc. If there is no value is that, it should stay on the CCD, which effectively means it's not available in OpenSolaris based distros. - Dermot
