Stephen Hahn wrote: > > I'm hoping that we can get to a more sophisticated form of software > delivery--like a package repository, say--as an outcome of the > Indiana/modernization efforts. In that case, the accessibility of > the CCD would increase dramatically. (Although, I think the costs of > having two identically-run consolidations is expensive and silly, so > we should probably examine the CCD and SFW separation, too, as a > distinct issue from what components are delivered where.)
Yes, an important characteristic of such a repository would be to achieve a balance between - ease of contributing for developers (reduce the overhead of making something available to users), and - providing reassurance on quality and stability to users (full support is not always needed) Dermot
