I now see that a few Linux releases appear to be going with 1.12.2, but 1.11 seems like a good choice. None have gone to 1.13 yet, just testing.
Can you email me the modified tests when you get a chance? Thanks, Steve C. UVR wrote: > Steven M. Christensen wrote at Mon Sep 21 2009 14:04:31 GMT-0700 (PDT): >> A couple of questions. >> >> Version 1.11 is kind of old. 1.13 has been released. I have done a build >> of 1.13 and it seems to be OK. Any reason 1.11 is better? > > 1.11 is the latest stable version. 1.13 seems to be unstable (from > http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fakeroot.html). My understanding > is that we only want to port the stable version. > >> Have you run the tests that come with fakeroot? Some of the tests seem >> to fail, but I think this may just be that the tests need to be modified >> for Solaris as the README indicates. > > That's correct -- about half the tests needed to be modified to > get them to run properly through 'make check' in the test sub- > directory. Once that's done, they all pass. > > -UVR. > >> Steve C. >> >> >> >> UVR wrote: >>> >>> I'm seeking a second round of code reviews for the 'fakeroot' package. >>> A webrev is available at: >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~uvr/fakeroot/ >>> >>> Change from the first round: >>> . Incorporate feedback from first round reviews >>> . Sync with current SFW gate >>> >>> My target build is coming up quickly, and I'll greatly appreciate >>> all feedback. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -UVR. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list >>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss >>> > >
