Hi
Charlie
When I said I'm not concerned
about Joe Average, this was only in reference to my line of
questioning.
All my customers pay top dollar
for my stuff and its all dialed in to the same standards regardless of playing
level.
I also suspect (as Arnie has
aluded to) that what the Lie Machine reads for Lie may be off anyway (by a
degree or 2),
since its a function
of how consistent the
iron is registered in the bending machine (based on getting score lines level by
sight).
Guess this is why after bending
they need to be validated on the range with impact stickers, looking for
center strikes.
Thanks
HarryS
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you saying that the Mitchell is not accurate? I doubt it, I think the gague on this machine is too small and difficult to read and it lacks a way to be sure the club has been clamped in a level position. That's why I prefer the Scotland.
Are you saying that the Mitchell is not accurate? I doubt it, I think the gague on this machine is too small and difficult to read and it lacks a way to be sure the club has been clamped in a level position. That's why I prefer the Scotland.
-----Original Message-----Harry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I found working with the pros as well as a lot of single digit handicappers is there is no norm. I have seen the 6 iron come out flatter than the 5. That is why as Tflan suggests that empirical testing is the best. I too bend before assembly as the final length is truer for the individual. As far as not worrying about the hacker because they can't feel a couple of degrees, I am a firm believer that proper specs are as if not more important for them because they unlike an accomplished golfer do not have the ability to adjust their swings to the equipment. Besides, that is what they are paying me do, make the clubs to fit their swing, good or bad.
Charlie
