On Saturday 19 April 2008, ss wrote:
[snip]
> The implication of those examples may be far more serious than that of a
> group posting as one on silk - but the deceit, combined with evasion of
> individual responsibility makes it comparable IMO.

I will agree with that. This is no different from communicating with an
anonymous person on the Internet - any words that can't be independently
verified shouldn't be taken at face value.

-Taj.


Reply via email to