I was not trying to pontificate when I made the cautionary statement in my previous post. Certainly, I do not mean to discourage persons from experimental investigations relating to animal...or human---health. My intention was to remind people that introducing foreign substances into the pulmonary tract of "any" higher mammal carries a certain degree of risk....which is not minor in potential compromise. I too, have owned, raced and cared-for, thoroughbred race horses for over 50 years and have---during that interval---encountered a majority of the threats---and their consequences---that can occur over such a time-span.
I can understand your personal feelings and I certainly agree with the logic of your comment relating to " a logical manner"...in your approach to this endeavor. I have witnessed some of the most atrocious events involving the ineptitude of humans in their "well-intentioned" treatments of horses----that I am over-sensitive.....to a fault.
My Sincerest Encouragement in your Equine Endeavors. Brooks Bradley.
-- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour
---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : Re: CS>one for brooks
Date : Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:39:18 -0600
From : "polo" <dah...@centurytel.net>
To : <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Brooks,
Thanks for your time and insight.
Yes, I have used DMSO/CS and find it very efficient in biofilm conditions. The only problem is that most USA horse racing jurisdiction have DMSO on a banned substance list. Not good for on going treatment, and it is one impetus for me to find new protocols.
I am a bit taken aback by your warning of not "fiddling/experimenting", even if I were a professional of which I do consider myself. I have been treating racehorses for over 30 years. I would suspect, if you see some of these animals come back to the saddling area gushing blood from their nostrils, you might change your mind. Particularly when our vets seem powerless to help. All they can offer is a few CCs of lasix as a preventive. I should think some fiddling and experimenting in a logical manner would be very much to the benefit of these animals. I have never caused harm yet.
I think you misunderstood me. I was not trying to produce liposomal CS via the ultrasonic or compressor type nebulizers. I was using them as a delivery device only for a home-made liposomal CS product made under your recommendations (only using CS instead of Vit C) from the harbor fright ultrasound cleaner,,,,,,,,and only then placing the finished liposomal CS product in one or the other type of that nebulizer for delivery into the lungs.
At any rate, thanks again.
doug
----- Original Message -----
From: Brooks Bradley
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: CS>one for brooks
I have only a few moments of time, at present. However, I offer a couple of comments on your inquiry.
First, there are a wide variety of enzymes which will act as solvents/penetrants of MANY membrane-type tissues/films. Bromelain
is one (a very effective one) of many. Some enzymes are "narrow spectrum" in effect and some are "wide spectrum". I have no knowledge of the effects of specific enzymes on the effectiveness/enhancement of antibiotics.
Briefly, the most effective liposomal substances are...as a general rule....the smallest in particle size. Ultrasonic
devices and HIGH PRESSURE DIFFRACTION DEVICES are, at present, the most effective for accomplishing this. Conventional air compressors could serve, quite adequately, in a large number of applications. The proviso being that one is aware that geometry
of the discharge assembly is of great importance (small particles are vital to non-injurious success).
We have utilized 90% colloidal silver X 10% DMSO SOLUTIONS to very powerful effect in addressing serious pulmonary insults in equines (all ages). We have not used enzymes in direct-address situations involving horses. Primarily, because nothing we have ever evaluated has approached the ability of DMSO as a mucous-barrier penetrating agent. Coarse-particled
gases (liquid mixtures) pose a potential threat for enabling pneumonia-type insults.
Liposomal encapsulation does, indeed, offer some profound advantages.....especially when utilized through proper
supporting equipment. However, I would counsel that "fiddling/experimenting" with pulmonary challenges among horses, by inexperienced persons (even professionals), is a very DANGEROUS endeavor. The least threatening/effective protocols we have ever utilized involved oxygen-driven fluids which were micro-sized and furnished via systems of the re-breather type.
I must go now. I hope these comments are of value to you.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
