Doug,
Have you used CS as a treatment for bleeders? If so, how do you do this.
Thanks.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: polo
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: CS>one for brooks
Brooks,
Thanks for your time and insight.
Yes, I have used DMSO/CS and find it very efficient in biofilm conditions.
The only problem is that most USA horse racing jurisdiction have DMSO on a
banned substance list. Not good for on going treatment, and it is one impetus
for me to find new protocols.
I am a bit taken aback by your warning of not "fiddling/experimenting", even
if I were a professional of which I do consider myself. I have been treating
racehorses for over 30 years. I would suspect, if you see some of these animals
come back to the saddling area gushing blood from their nostrils, you might
change your mind. Particularly when our vets seem powerless to help. All they
can offer is a few CCs of lasix as a preventive. I should think some fiddling
and experimenting in a logical manner would be very much to the benefit of
these animals. I have never caused harm yet.
I think you misunderstood me. I was not trying to produce liposomal CS via
the ultrasonic or compressor type nebulizers. I was using them as a delivery
device only for a home-made liposomal CS product made under your
recommendations (only using CS instead of Vit C) from the harbor fright
ultrasound cleaner,,,,,,,,and only then placing the finished liposomal CS
product in one or the other type of that nebulizer for delivery into the lungs.
At any rate, thanks again.
doug
----- Original Message -----
From: Brooks Bradley
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: CS>one for brooks
I have only a few moments of time, at present. However, I offer a couple of
comments on your inquiry.
First, there are a wide variety of enzymes which will act as
solvents/penetrants of MANY membrane-type tissues/films. Bromelain
is one (a very effective one) of many. Some enzymes are "narrow spectrum"
in effect and some are "wide spectrum". I have no knowledge of the effects of
specific enzymes on the effectiveness/enhancement of antibiotics.
Briefly, the most effective liposomal substances are...as a general
rule....the smallest in particle size. Ultrasonic
devices and HIGH PRESSURE DIFFRACTION DEVICES are, at present, the most
effective for accomplishing this. Conventional air compressors could serve,
quite adequately, in a large number of applications. The proviso being that one
is aware that geometry
of the discharge assembly is of great importance (small particles are vital
to non-injurious success).
We have utilized 90% colloidal silver X 10% DMSO SOLUTIONS to very powerful
effect in addressing serious pulmonary insults in equines (all ages). We have
not used enzymes in direct-address situations involving horses. Primarily,
because nothing we have ever evaluated has approached the ability of DMSO as a
mucous-barrier penetrating agent. Coarse-particled
gases (liquid mixtures) pose a potential threat for enabling pneumonia-type
insults.
Liposomal encapsulation does, indeed, offer some profound
advantages.....especially when utilized through proper
supporting equipment. However, I would counsel that
"fiddling/experimenting" with pulmonary challenges among horses, by
inexperienced persons (even professionals), is a very DANGEROUS endeavor. The
least threatening/effective protocols we have ever utilized involved
oxygen-driven fluids which were micro-sized and furnished via systems of the
re-breather type.
I must go now. I hope these comments are of value to you.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
