There should be a frequently asked question and answer file with the list. Repeated dumb questions are annoying and don't get answered properly anyway.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Now, now, keep it civil. > > Problem? Where? But I think if you whistle, I'll point. > > Lot of fancy talk and misleading info in that blog. I use far less > paraphernalia than that, as most on this planet do, and I store my product > in clear glass storage vessels, and mine doesn't degrade after months in > storage. I definitely don't need to scrape anything off the surface of the > water??? The only thing I'll concede is that I store mine in a cupboard, > but apart from that what you produce is no better to what I produce, and > that of most everyone else out there. > > Failing a suitable response to my request for your laboratory analysis > reports, I rest my case. > > N. > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:03:47 +0000 > > Subject: Re: CS>PPM vs uS > From: mothman...@gmail.com > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Take your problem somewhere else > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > 8-12ppm would be acceptable for *anyone* wishing to produce 10ppm in the > home with LVDC using whatever meter they choose! > > And I was asked for considerably more than 20ml when I had my lab tests > done using AAS. > > No meter is "hopelessly inadequate" for the home producer, they are a > guide to repeatable production levels of silver relative to the individuals > methods, means and practices of production in the kitchen, regardless of > how inaccurate they may be. ANY meter is better than none for the home > producer for the purpose of approximating silver content in what an > individual is making. Most home producers have not the means for > laboratory analysis so what do they do? Stop making their own and purchase > a product just because a ppm is written on the label? > > A uS or EC meter is the best the punter can do, or a TDS meter and > doubling the reading, how accurate does the punter need to be in the scheme > of things home produced? > > In my opinion it's this sort of information that is potentially confusing > and misleading for the punter, and will have them thinking they *MAY?* not > be producing a good quality product in the home without a laboratory > analysis...which is total bunkum and balderdash! If there is nil mud or > gravel or other abnormalities observable in their product after days/weeks > or months in storage, it's as good as can be made, using a meter of their > choosing as a guide! > > Could you put up laboratory analysis results of 5 consecutive dated batch > samples you had tested indicating total silver content for each, and > brewed for identical time frames? > > I'm the voice of an uneducated punter, humour me. > > N. > > > > >
