[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bystr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm kind of in the middle of the stack provider and the UA provider here... > But I guess I should interpret your responses that in case of a sip uri > with > the # error, there is no specification that says that the UAS (B2BUA in > this > case) MUST send a sip response? > > Clearly, the UA should send a response, either success or failure, > depending on the strategy you choose. Otherwise the upstream agent > will keep sending you the request, and then eventually time-out, which > from the point of view of the overall SIP system is the worst failure > mode.
Oh, duh! Yes. I hope Andreas wasn't considering the option of sending *no* response. IMO there is no obligation for the UAS to send an *error* response in this case. It *may* respond with a 2xx, ignoring the error. Paul _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors