ROFLMAO... Loved it. Kevin Summers KISTech Internet Services Inc. www.kistech.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [smartBridges] TnT Show on Z-92 > > > (Anyone who's been through the midwest will understand the subject, but > that's not the point of this message....) > > I am as upset as anyone with the recent troubles SB is having. > > However: > > I know that they are working to correct them. It is not the fault of a > vendor if their supplier changes critical components and doesn't tell them > the implications of doing so, or tell them at all. If you would like to > file a Class Action Lawsuit (CAL), your defendant would be Atmel, not SB. > > As the technical product manager for the computer network for the largest > railroad in the world, I have the opportunity to work with many hardware > and software vendors. Other than possibly Novell, I have not worked with a > company that has tried harder to work with their customers than SB has. > I've gotten calls from Sinagapore to try to help me resolve issues. > > You ever get a call from anyone in Redmond offering to help with any > issues you may have had with M$ products? > > We are all going through a tough time right now, SB as well as the rest of > us. I have personally gotten frustrated and said things on this forum that > probably could have (should have) been presented in a more polite > manner. > And I'm probably going to look to another CPE until SB gets these issues > resolved. But I have to point out that I also have CPEs that I installed > from Oct 2002 until Apr 2003 that are working like the Energizer bunny; > They keep going and going and going.... And I have an APPO that hasn't > been rebooted in over eight months, and is still going strong. So SB can > (and does) make a great product. Hopefully they'll be able to get back to > where they were, and <side rant> hopefully some people on the list will > stop pushing them so hard to add new things too quickly (you know who you > are... :) > > And if they do push, hopefully SB will resist. :) > > -=- > > But TnT: Next time, please be respectful (or at least sober) when you post > your flames. (See below for my comical interlude.... :) > > Sam > > > On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tom & Toni Maris wrote: > > > My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than > $6,000.00 in this > > gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. > > prtoblems? Hmmmm.... Who installed them? > > > On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we read > the fine print > > on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just > replacement units > > and that you have to have the original box! > > Thwy do? > ~ > > Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier class. > > This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an > honest company. > > That sounds like slander to me. (Or is it libel?) Maybe time for a class > action suit.... To imply they are dishonest would imply a willful intent > to defraud. Other than the TnT show, I don't think anyone on this list > thinks SB's intent was to defraud anyone. (TnT: That means they > never sold > you anything with the intent to rip you off.) > > > First I would like to know where they get off saying anything > about Carrier > > class. > > To have a first, there has to be a second..... > > > Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, why do > you need an > > original box to sned them back, and why don't they do refunds? > > If I were to sned one back they'd probably RMA me a tissue. > > <ghezuenteight?> > > > Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this Smartbridge company > > stand behind their products or give everyone their money back. > > A lawsuite? How about a whole suite of lawyers? Wait. How about a > suite of > people sneding? > > /more tissues.... > > >He thinks > > He does? > > > that their is probably enough people like us who got ripped off > to get a > > class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this pile of junk > > their: shows possession > there: pointing towards > > Pretty simple stuff. Not something to be confused, misconstrued, or > otherwise pondered in the mind of someone considering a lawsuite. > > > Very very disapointed > > Me too. Flamers should *always* use a spell checker. And in your case, a > grammer checker <sic> and breathalyzer as well. > > -=-=-=-=-=- > > Sorry... couldn't resist. :) Besides - I've invested well beyond $6k in > this. And ya know what? Most all of it works like a champ. > > Sam > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
