On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 07:37:47PM +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > > On a related note... my super-secret plan is to get rid of sysvinit and > > > make a highly optimized init process that does just enough to get dbus > > > and (optionally) X up. That may as well be incorporated into > > > fso-monitord, we'll see... > > > > Interesting... so you mean, if I got it right, that once you start dbus > > and X, all the rest that needs to run in the system is a dbus service > > anyway, so it can be started by dbus itself when anything needs it? > > Correct. With system and session activation, dbus-daemon could be seen > as an on-demand init system itself.
Interesting... I wonder how come noone's thought of this yet. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org> _______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
