|
Sorry think I misread yours, on
re-reading it think you were saying the law should be changed to where they
couldn't do them after a certain week of pregancy correct? If so, my
apologies...ignore the one below. I read it as you saying that was the law
now.....
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:14
AM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] New Support for
Arnold
Depends on your state, in some
states they do not have to be
done by a certaun week in your pregancy. In some yes, but in others...
Arkansas among them unless something has recently changed, their legal all the
way up thru the 9th month.
In several states it's legal 5
minutes before birth, 5 minutes later it's murder. If you ask me, it's murder
in both cases....one's just legal while the other isn't.
Amazing......
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:39
AM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] New Support for
Arnold
I
do agree with you on the fact that if you allow it, then those that do use
it as a form of birth control will keep on using it as that, but at the same
time isnt it better to have them do it that way in a medical office, than
trying to do it when its illegal and possibly killing both the child and
themselves? There are some cases that it can be warranted. I know myself
would not want to carry a child conceived out of rape or incest as many
others wouldnt want to either. But at the same time, my parents asked me
when they found out I was pregnant if I wanted to have an abortion and I
refused it no matter what. Unfortunatly in today's society though, I really
dont see abortion laws changing to make them illegal again, so just work to
make it a little more difficult to obtain one. They have to be done by a
certain week in the pregnancy, in the case of teenagers, parents must always
consent to it also and disallow them in women that have had so many.
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:25
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] New
Support for Arnold
In a message dated 10/9/2003
11:14:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I told Lowell,
just checking. This is one subject I usually dont give my opinion on b/c
in most cases most people dont understand it, but I feel I must explain.
I dont consider myself pro abortion. I dont believe in goofing up and
going out and having an abortion just b/c you dont want to be pregnant.
But at the same time, I dont feel its right for certain women to feel
like murderers b/c they were raped and wound up pregnant and dont want
to carry the baby of a rapist. So I guess in that way, I am pro choice.
It's not something I myself would want to do, but who am I to tell
someone else what they can or cant do with their own body. But I do
strongly oppose abortion as a means of birth control as I have known
some girls to do. But not e'one that is pro choice totally condones
abortion, so it seems kinda bad to say all pro choice people are pro
abortion.
i understand your position and i respect
it
my belief though is if a person is pro choice then even though
that person is only for certain situations they are still for something
which gives that choice to people who are going to use it for birth
control. and no matter what reason its for its still considered abortion
in any situation so it would still be pro abortion
unless its a
life or death situation where both will die but theres a chance to save
the mother abortion is still considered murder of an unborn
child
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
