Give Tyco a call, I'm betting they've run into this before. Ed Kramer Littleton, CO
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sprinklerforum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Browning > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Slippery Slope > > I have a project we designed the Dry System with 7 SD Attic heads. The > ME wants the Area and Slope increases per 11.2.3.2.4 and 11.2.3.2.5. I > pointed out the listing of the Attic heads but all he says is " If it's > OK with the Local AHJ, he takes " no exception to that design approach" > but he will not stamp the drawings saying this, even tho he DID stamp > the first set " rejected/ resubmit"! > > LOcal AHJ requires plans to be stamped by the EOR or the Architect prior > to submission, and the Architect won't stamp them " because". > > Trying to build a case that what we did is " per NFPA 13 and industry > standard. > Any thoughts? > Dennis Browning > Browning Fire > Medford, Oregon > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
