Good idea Bruce. The form to make that suggestion is in NFPA 13 }:-) How's Kent doing?
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't understood why the freezer set up for future testing was not the > standard for all double interlock systems. > > Everyone knows the day the system goes in the server farm operator is not > going to allow trip tests. When we've asked for a letter from the owner > confirming testing will be allowed the valve always gets put in. > > Bruce Verhei > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jay Stough" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:47:47 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific > Subject: Preaction inspections > > For those of you doing inspections, how do you handle preaction systems? > 13.4.3.2.3 says that they should be trip tested fully open every three years > similar to dry systems. We don't inspect a lot of preaction systems, but all > of the owners have not let us do a full trip, they are afraid of water > leaking out of the system on to their equipment. > > Jay Stough > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > -- Ron Greenman at home.... _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
