I know of 7, 3 big box, one in AZ, one in MA, and one in GA.  

A storage warehouse in St. Paul but the system was off during an arson fire
while the sprinkler contractor was working on it and the heads where it
started were severely obstructed.  In the end with the quick thinking fitter
and a little luck it was a minor loss but 46 heads did operate.  No
injuries. 

A running dust fire in St. Paul in a cardstock mill.  The fire from the dust
was minor until it reached a 200' x 75' wood exhaust hood.  Which would
really have not been a big deal had they not retrofitted a metal one above.
250 something heads operated. In the end it looked bad but they never
stopped the plant including the rollers under the fire. No injuries.

A fire in a multistory apartment in West St. Paul that went up the outside
into the sprinklered attic.  I never got an official report on this but
recall 30 something heads operated.  Other than some water most of the
building was habitable after the fire.  FD had to escort many elderly out
initially. No injuries.

Manufacturing plant in West St. Paul again, I think, maybe South St. Paul.
Some type of pressure vessel took off for the moon and while going through
the roof took out the sprinkler main and a high pressure 2" gas line.  As I
recall the cause of the launch wasn't a sprinkler preventable issue.
In-other-words an uncontrolled fire didn't cause the launch. The many 10's
of thousands of sq. ft. were on the ground as the FD arrived or very shortly
thereafter. No injuries I think.   

I guess one wanting to make a case would include 9/11 but that was a MISSLE
ATTACK in an act of WAR. 

But don't take my count to infer I think we should be designing most
buildings for sprinkler failure.  Most buildings IMHO do not need more than
sprinklers and a few exits for fire safety.  Assumed in that statement is
properly installed and maintained, not subject to war.  And I know there are
those that disagree.  And at least 5 I list were questionable if they were
proper.  It's the assumed part that leads to the discussion.      

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESFR and Smoke Vents

"Many instances?" Care to list a few for us?

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of å... ....
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ESFR and Smoke Vents

where the sprinklers systems simply did not do their job

scot deal

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to