They did make a couple of test flights to the moon before landing on it even though the math said it could be done.
John -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Hydrant Flow Test time frame for validity I'm still waiting on the model that will give a hint that the latest work on an area left a valve closed so the calculated loop is invalid. Roland On May 12, 2009, at 11:05 AM, R Richardson wrote: > Hi Thom, > > Thanks for the feedback. We have been operating under the same set > of assumptions you are speaking of and we are starting to see lots > of issues about old pipe becoming severely tuberculated (for example > the water map shows a 8 in main, but the water test shows the main > to now be equivalent to a 4 in main. Some of the older pipe that > was installed is unlined DI, the tuberculation is brutal. The > concrete lined DI does not share the same problem > > So, be careful about assuming the pipe is good, if it was unlined it > may be much smaller than what it was originally. > > Rich _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
