Hello A.P.Silva,

I'm Interested

Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 1:48:53 PM, you wrote:

> Scot,

> If there are others interested, I'll give more details on the forum.
> Otherwise, I'll reply directly to your e-mail.

> Tony 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of å... ....
> Sent: December 16, 2009 12:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Drop Wood Ceiling





> Tony:

> You have my interest on the performance of the exposed cpcv piping.
> with what you know about this fire, and it seems you know quite a bit, with
> all respect, then was the exposed cpcv at fault in this fire?

> you mentioned the pump failed.  if the pump did not fail, what do you think
> would have been the performance of the cpcv?

> did the roof have a non-combustible membrane separating it from the area
> below the roof, or was it a simple wood construction roof (somewhat odd for
> CA construction from my experiences).

> I will ask on-line and on-forum, if you feel it better for all to learn
> together.
> I do.  but I want to ask your permission of what you would rather.

> scot deal
> excelsior fire




> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40, A.P.Silva <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I agree. It is the standard that determines what is needed, not the 
>> AHJ. If the intent of the standard is clear, a ruling by the AHJ 
>> different from the standard will not get you off the hook.

>> Sometime back an AHJ issued a bullettin permitting the installation of 
>> exposed cpvc, contrary to the requirements of the building code that 
>> were applicable during that time. Many buildings in that locality were 
>> installed with exposed cpvc. Everything was fine, till a school with 
>> exposed cpvc had a fire. To cut a long story short, the fire started 
>> at the roof, the pump stopped working,  and the entire school burned down.
> However, the "expert"
>> hired by the owner claimed the system failed due to the burning of the 
>> exposed cpvc pipe. In addition to the AHJ bullettin, the engineer for 
>> the project issued an addendum permitting the use of exposed cpvc. 
>> This engineer also provided inspections (for which I was not hired).

>> When the lawyer for the owner asked me why I (working for the 
>> sprinkler
>> contractor) designed for cpvc, I showed the addendum, and was told I 
>> was the expert and have a responsibility to advise the engineer. When 
>> I showed the bullettin, I was asked whether I did not know that the 
>> AHJ was not an engineer.

>> Interestingly, since then that bullettin has been rescinded. Also, 
>> cpvc (exposed or protected) is now totally prohibited for schools in 
>> that jurisdiction.

>> The moral of the story is comply with the standard.

>> Tony

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> Richardson, R
>> Sent: December 15, 2009 3:01 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>>  Subject: RE: Drop Wood Ceiling

>> I would suggest that in this case you do not check with the AHJ.  NFPA 
>> 13 clearly requires sprinklers in the space, unless the wood is FR.
>> Personally, I get annoyed with a phone call whose goal is to simply 
>> confirm what NFPA clearly states.  There are plenty of off-beat 
>> situations not clearly addressed by NFPA where a phone inquiry is 
>> required, this is not one of them.

>> Rich Richardson
>> Seattle Fire Department

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> njarendt tds.net
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 13:44
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Drop Wood Ceiling

>> Check with the authority having jurisdiction.  They are the ones that 
>> ultimately will determine what is needed.  Contact up front with the 
>> AHJ usually saves a lot in the long run.  I do plan review for 2 fire 
>> districts and time and energy can be saved by this up front discussion 
>> on issues like this.

>> Norm
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jimmy Waite
>> <[email protected]>wrote:

>> > Gentlemen,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We have a situation where an engineer in requiring sprinkler 
>> > protection above a drop wood ceiling.  The building is light hazard 
>> > and noncombustible, and we have obviously provided protection below 
>> > the ceiling.  I can't place a code reference in defense of either 
>> > side.  It would seem that we have adequately protected the wood 
>> > ceiling by protecting the floor space below it.  On the other hand, 
>> > the back of the wood ceiling would mean there are combustibles in a 
>> > concealed space.  What is everyone's opinion?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Jimmy Waite
>> >
>> > Design Engineer
>> >
>> >
>> > Piedmont Fire Protection Systems, LLC
>> >
>> > 3609 Bastion Lane
>> >
>> > Raleigh, NC  27604
>> >
>> >
>> > o: 919.212.2356
>> >
>> > f:  919.212.2357
>> >
>> >  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>> >
>> > web:  <http://www.piedmontfire.com/> www.piedmontfire.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> >
>> > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
>> > [email protected]
>> >
>> > To Unsubscribe, send an email
>> > to:[email protected]<to%3ASprinklerforum-requ
>> > [email protected]>
>> <to%3ASprinklerforum-reques
>> > [email protected]> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

>> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
>> to:[email protected]<to%3ASprinklerforum-reques
>> [email protected]> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

>> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
>> to:[email protected]<to%3ASprinklerforum-reques
>> [email protected]> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

>> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
>> to:[email protected]<to%3ASprinklerforum-reques
>> [email protected]> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



-- 
Best regards,
 Charles Thurston                            mailto:[email protected]
  Coastal Fire Protection/ Myrtle Beach Fire & Safety Co.
AFAA Guest

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to