The only other possible concern is a fire scenario near the pre-action/wet pipe 
transition that opens a wet pipe head, the water affects the smoke enough so 
that the smokes have delayed operation while the fire spreads into the 
pre-action area.  

Realistic scenario? not sure, how are those models doing these days to simulate 
the affects of sprinkler discharge on smoke travel?

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pielow, Robert
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 07:15
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

There would not be an issue if a sprinkler head from the wet system were to be 
installed in the pre action area.  It would sense heat, open, and discharge 
water. The zoning and annunciation might be screwed up, but the head would 
still operate. 

The big issue is if a pre action head were to be installed in the wet area 
without extending the detection.  This could also include a new office or 
closet.  The pre action system head could open from a fire but no water would 
discharge because the detection leg of the pre action system has not yet 
activated.

Robert J. Pielow, P.E.
Fire Protection & Life Safety



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:37 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

I saw an example of a DI PA system covering only a part of the floor of a 
production facility. They had one piece of equipment that was very water 
sensitive and (I was told) mind-numbingly expensive. The only thing that the 
insurance company would allow was a DI PA system over that piece of equipment. 


Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP 
Sales Engineer 
Alliance Fire Protection 
*Licensed in KS & MO 

913.888.0647 ph 
913.888.0618 f 
913.927.0222 cell 
www. AFPsprink.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richardson, R
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

Actually, "want" is not really the situation.

It is a large high rise containing a museum on lower floors. The museum 
requires all sprinklers on any floors directly above to be double interlock 
pre-action systems, apparently as a condition to get certain exhibits in place. 
However, the museum does not cover the entire first floor (complicated 
building(s), multiple fire control rooms,  etc). Until a recent change there 
was a wall on most (all?) floors above in line with the separation between the 
museum and other spaces.  On at least one floor the wall is being removed, and 
only the sprinklers directly above are apparently being required to be 
pre-action, logical??

In any case we are leaning towards two additional rows of detection into the 
non-pre-action area, or the wet pipe flow switch idea, or of course full 
detection, but it is a somewhat large space so $$ is part of the conversation.

As for why a double interlock freezer type system, massive paranoia surrounds 
me.  Nearly every computer room in this town has been sold a double interlock 
system - we have an entire high rise full of server rooms the whole darn thing 
protected by double interlock.  Nothing prohibits it as far as I know, would 
not be my choice personally, but those pre-action system in that high rise sure 
beat the un-sprinklered condition that particular building used to be in.  We 
do try to restrict the use of both cross zoning and double interlock together, 
and alarm verification etc.

Thanks,

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

Why does someone want to cover part of a large open area with a system
specifically designed to cover freezer warehouses?

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Scott A. Futrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> SI or DI?
>
> IMHO never a good idea to have two different systems of any type in the
> same room.  Maintenance?  Which do you turn off in emergency?
> Remodeling?
>
> Smoke on non-pa side operates PA and somebody has to drain all the
> drops...
>
> Scott Futrell
>
> (763) 425-1001 Office
> (612) 759-5556 Cell
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Richardson, R
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> Good idea Chris, thanks.  Invaluable forum as previously stated.  Can
> AHJ's join this association as a means of support for this resource.
>
> Rich Richardson
> Seattle Fire Department
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris
> Cahill
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> I think Brad is on the right track.  With the detection should pick up
> things in the non-PA space near the boundary so it's just a dry system
> as it
> spreads to the PA side of things.  The whole non-PA side maybe not.
>
> Thinking out loud couldn't the non-PA flow switch be tied into the PA
> system
> along with the detection to trip the electrical side of the PA valve?
>
> Chris Cahill, P.E.
> Fire Protection Engineer
> Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
>
> 763-658-4483
> 763-658-4921 fax
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> Mail: P.O. Box 69
>        Waverly, MN 55390
>
> Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
>              Waverly, MN 55390
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Richardson, R
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> Seeking opinions about a proposal where a pre-action system covers part
> of a
> large space, the other parts being covered with a wet pipe system.
> There is
> no separation between the two system types.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rich Richardson
> Seattle Fire Department
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering
Bates Technical College
Tacoma, WA

Member:
AFT WA 4184/AFL-CIO, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to