Has anyone considered just putting the wall back between these systems.

I know that something that simple will leave out all the various
engineering, and pondering of possible and probable's. No fire modeling,
advanced detection systems or inflated fees, but hey I'm just a simple guy.

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richardson, R
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

Actually, "want" is not really the situation.

It is a large high rise containing a museum on lower floors. The museum
requires all sprinklers on any floors directly above to be double interlock
pre-action systems, apparently as a condition to get certain exhibits in
place. However, the museum does not cover the entire first floor
(complicated building(s), multiple fire control rooms,  etc). Until a recent
change there was a wall on most (all?) floors above in line with the
separation between the museum and other spaces.  On at least one floor the
wall is being removed, and only the sprinklers directly above are apparently
being required to be pre-action, logical??

In any case we are leaning towards two additional rows of detection into the
non-pre-action area, or the wet pipe flow switch idea, or of course full
detection, but it is a somewhat large space so $$ is part of the
conversation.

As for why a double interlock freezer type system, massive paranoia
surrounds me.  Nearly every computer room in this town has been sold a
double interlock system - we have an entire high rise full of server rooms
the whole darn thing protected by double interlock.  Nothing prohibits it as
far as I know, would not be my choice personally, but those pre-action
system in that high rise sure beat the un-sprinklered condition that
particular building used to be in.  We do try to restrict the use of both
cross zoning and double interlock together, and alarm verification etc.

Thanks,

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system

Why does someone want to cover part of a large open area with a system
specifically designed to cover freezer warehouses?

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Scott A. Futrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> SI or DI?
>
> IMHO never a good idea to have two different systems of any type in the
> same room.  Maintenance?  Which do you turn off in emergency?
> Remodeling?
>
> Smoke on non-pa side operates PA and somebody has to drain all the
> drops...
>
> Scott Futrell
>
> (763) 425-1001 Office
> (612) 759-5556 Cell
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Richardson, R
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> Good idea Chris, thanks.  Invaluable forum as previously stated.  Can
> AHJ's join this association as a means of support for this resource.
>
> Rich Richardson
> Seattle Fire Department
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris
> Cahill
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> I think Brad is on the right track.  With the detection should pick up
> things in the non-PA space near the boundary so it's just a dry system
> as it
> spreads to the PA side of things.  The whole non-PA side maybe not.
>
> Thinking out loud couldn't the non-PA flow switch be tied into the PA
> system
> along with the detection to trip the electrical side of the PA valve?
>
> Chris Cahill, P.E.
> Fire Protection Engineer
> Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
>
> 763-658-4483
> 763-658-4921 fax
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> Mail: P.O. Box 69
>        Waverly, MN 55390
>
> Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
>              Waverly, MN 55390
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Richardson, R
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Pre-action in same space as wet pipe system
>
> Seeking opinions about a proposal where a pre-action system covers part
> of a
> large space, the other parts being covered with a wet pipe system.
> There is
> no separation between the two system types.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rich Richardson
> Seattle Fire Department
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering
Bates Technical College
Tacoma, WA

Member:
AFT WA 4184/AFL-CIO, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to