I got it Ed! Calc the most demanding 912 SF, but ADD the demand for the head
in the 'atrium' on your way to the BOR- (the precedent is an 'un-attached'
water curtain- and the heat that activated the 912 SF is likely irritating
that head now anyway). The great beauty of this scheme is that you prove the
most demanding Pe-wise while you are at it ;)


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Greenman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: QR design area reduction

You use the sprinklers to lower the level of the diesel exhaust down
to breathing level? Sprinkler water and diesel fumes. I bet that gets
the kids out of the shop quick.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Thom <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would say if you "Protect" the pocket, and since the volume of the
pocket
> is only 825CF (less than the 1000CF discussed as "Unprotected", Think 4' x
> 8' = 32 sf x 31.25 VF = 1000 CF) I wouldn't be concerned about any "Delay"
> and if Smoke = Heat, rising into the pocket, the "Protection" should drive
> both down when the protection activates.
>
> No NIST, just knows what happens to diesel exhaust in our shop.
>
> Happy TGIF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron
Greenman
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: QR design area reduction
>
> Well, since everyone is guessing I'm willing also. Cover the floor
> area from sprinklers at the main ceiling level (you said that the
> "pocket" was 11' in the greater dimension) and 1, ignore the pocket or
> 2, put a head in the pocket, through magic and sleight of hand, apply
> the rule about not including the heads under roll-up doors. The
> situation is the same (except for the height issue) in that only the
> lower or higher head would fuse. I also saw a computer model from NIST
> on smoke travel relative to large and small, "atria," "pockets,) etc.
> On small stuff (and the maximum for small was pretty big) the smoke
> tended to begin to fill the higher area but also cross horizontally.
> Very rapidly a thermal barrier developed across the opening and the
> smoke (visible heat) banked against it and ceased to infiltrate the to
> the higher ceiling. So I started with guessing and I'm ending on that
> note.
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Thom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just my thoughts: 1) Your "Atrium" is too large to be a ceiling pocket
> 32SF
>> or less as allowed in the Reduced area for QR. 2) You don't say the
> ceiling
>> is sloped, not that it would matter if it when up to 23' because that
also
>> exceeds what is allowed to be used when applying the reduction. 3) Unless
>> these areas are separated somehow or not located within the same
>> compartment, In which case by using multiple design areas to allow the
>> reduced area for QR where the "Atrium" is not located, my opinion is you
>> can't use the Area reduction for QR in this situation.
>>
>> Except: (4) There are no unprotected ceiling pockets as allowed by
>> 8.6.7 and 8.8.7 exceeding 32 ft2 (3 m2)
>>
>> So if you change the name of your "Atrium" to "Ceiling pocket" and
protect
>> it, is the new layout (Symantec's) allowed to use the QR/Area reduction?
>>
>> 8.6.7 Ceiling Pockets.
>> 8.6.7.1 Sprinklers shall be required in all ceiling pockets.
>> 8.6.7.2 The requirements of 8.6.7.1 shall not apply where all
>> of the following are met:
>> (1) The total volume of the unprotected ceiling pocket does
>> not exceed 1000 ft3 (28.3 m3).
>> (2) The depth of the unprotected pocket does not exceed
>> 36 in. (914 mm).
>> (3) The entire floor under the unprotected ceiling pocket is
>> protected by the sprinklers at the lower ceiling elevation.
>> (4) Each unprotected ceiling pocket is separated from any
>> adjacent unprotected ceiling pocket by a minimum 10 ft
>> (3.05 m) horizontal distance.
>> (5) The unprotected ceiling pocket is constructed of noncombustible
>> or limited combustible construction.
>> (6) Skylights not exceeding 32 ft2 (3m2) shall be permitted to
>> have a plastic cover.
>> (7) Quick response sprinklers are utilized throughout the
>> compartment.
>>
>> So if as Roland say's "Word have meanings" and we can only know what the
>> word's say, not what the author "Intended".  Well, it sounds like you
> place
>> sprinklers in the "Atrium", change its name to "Ceiling Pocket", and use
> the
>> area reduction.
>>
>> It is Friday right?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron
> Greenman
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 1:39 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: QR design area reduction
>>
>> Good question. Don't have an answer but I do have an opinion, but like
>> all opinions….
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Ed Kramer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I've got a light hazard dining area with a 10'-6" ceiling which meets
all
>>> the criteria for reducing the design area down to 912 sf.  Well, almost
>> all
>>> the criteria.  There is one small 'atrium' with a 23' ceiling height.
>  The
>>> 'atrium' is only 6' x 11' and is protected by 1 sprinkler.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am I allowed to reduce the design area based on the 10'-6" ceiling
> height,
>>> or must I calculate a full 1,500 sf?   Or more generically, how small
> must
>>> an area of higher ceiling be in order to ignore it when applying section
>>> 11.2.3.2.3?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ed Kramer
>>>
>>> Littleton, CO
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>>
>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>>
>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ron Greenman
>> Instructor
>> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
>> Bates Technical College
>> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
>> Tacoma, WA 98405
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
>>
>> 253.680.7346
>> 253.576.9700 (cell)
>>
>> Member:
>> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
>>
>> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
>> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
>
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
>
> Member:
> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
>
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to