And that suggests to me that if the building Jarron is working on is not
in an area where seismic protection is required that the use of the 3/4"
pipe nipples is allowed. Have I got that wrong?
PARSLEY CONSULTING
Ken Wagoner, SET
760.745.6181 voice
760.745.0537 fax
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>e-mail
www.ParsleyConsulting.com <http://www.ParsleyConsulting.com>website
On 6/25/2012 11:18 AM, Brad Casterline wrote:
It means the .5 or .75 x 0-4 nips are not allowed on re-vamp of existing
systems under seismic rules.
****************************************************************************
What confuses me is why does the following paragraph exist if 1" pipe is the
minimum size for hydraulic systems: 8.15.19.4.5 The use of pipe nipples
less than 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter
shall not be permitted where seismic design is required on the system.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
