Like.

Steve

-------- Original message --------
From: Ron Greenman <[email protected]> 
Date:01/17/2014  4:45 PM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: "Street" elbows 

Ben,

The interaction between the Pope schedule and the pipe schedule go back to 
Peter. The schism occurs with the election of Pope Pipus I during the Synod of 
Hydros. Pipus was declared a heretic when he wanted to change his name to Pope 
Pius Pipus, the PPP trinity. Defrocked he established the Pipus Schedulus 
(later pipe schedule) Heresy. I for one have been a devotee of the stinky black 
water baptism on many occasions.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 17, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Ben Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> How does the Pope schedule start?  I know it ends with John Paul, Benedict,
> and then Francis.
> 
> Do we go all the way back to Peter, because that's a heck of a long
> schedule if so...
> 
> 
> Benjamin Young
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Ron Greenman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I believe the prohibition is based on the concept that the threads on 1/2
>> nipples or fittings are too weak, when subject to the bending forces
>> applied by a cantilevered weight as found in a goose necked drop to likely
>> survive a seismic event. The 4" nipple max has to do with limiting the
>> hydraulic degradation in a pope schedule scenario that has just been left
>> as written before Wass gave us a way to calculate a system.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Forest Wilson Fire Sprinkler Contractor <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I dont underatand how a fitting would be considered a pipe nipple.
>>> The prohibition against using 1/2" pipe in earthquake zones should not
>> apply to the use of street l fittings.
>>> 
>>> If it did, then the same argument could could made against using any
>> 1/2" fitting.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Forest Wilson
>>> Fire Sprinkler Contractor
>>> 937-736-0425
>>> 
>>> Notice:
>>> This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise
>> protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have
>> received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it
>> from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to
>> anyone. Please send us by fax any message containing deadlines as incoming
>> e-mails are not screened for response deadlines. The integrity and security
>> of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.
>>> 
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Ron Greenman <[email protected]>
>>> Date:01/17/2014  5:33 PM  (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: "Street" elbows
>>> 
>>> I thought this was about using 1" st ells in a tight spot, not changing
>> uprights to pendants. And of course you can use them and they're readily
>> available through plumbing suppliers if your sprinkler supplier doesn't
>> have them. They come in reducing types, in black steel, galvy, stainless,
>> bronze, and in weights (strength) equivalent to schedule 40, 80, 120 & 160.
>> Very common for industrial boiler application.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Todd - Work <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Charles, I would be careful. You can't use 1/2" nipples in an
>> earthquake zone (8.15.19.4.4). Given your proximity to Charleston, this may
>> be a concern. I would assume street elbows (if permitted) would fall under
>> the same category.
>>>> 
>>>> Todd G Williams, PE
>>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>>>> Stonington, CT
>>>> www.fpdc.com
>>>> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Kenneth Berman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> close nipples are as close as street ells. 1/2 x 1/2 x 1 tees and you
>> can
>>>>> leave the uprights, or for tight spaces where you can eliminate the
>>>>> upright, use 1 x 1 x 1/2 with a 1" plug.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Charles Thurston <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I do wish I could find some 1/2" Male x 1" Female Street ells for a
>>>>>> upright to pendant conversion project.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Friday, January 17, 2014, 4:25:23 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think it comes down to if the street elbows are made according to
>>>>>>> the appropriate ASTM standard from Table 6.4.1. In your defense,
>>>>>>> 6.4.6.1 states that unless circumstances exist where hex bushings
>>>>>>> are allowed, one piece reducer fittings shall be used for a change in
>>>>>> pipe size.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Todd G Williams, PE
>>>>>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>>>>>>> Stonington, CT
>>>>>>> www.fpdc.com
>>>>>>> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 3:43 PM, "Morey, Mike" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So I seem to remember this being a "no-no" but the code doesn't
>> seem to
>>>>>> explicitly prohibit us from using them.  I have a tight squeeze where
>> a 1"
>>>>>> male x female "street" elbow would be helpful, but I want to make
>> sure I'm
>>>>>> not missing something in 13 that prohibits it, we use the 2010
>> edition.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Mike Morey, CFPS, SET
>>>>>>>> Planner Scheduler/Designer
>>>>>>>> BMWC Constructors, Inc.
>>>>>>>> 1740 W. Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN 46222
>>>>>>>> O: 317.651.0596 | C: 317.586.8111
>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | www.bmwc.com<
>>>>>> http://www.bmwc.com/>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Charles Thurston                          mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>> Systems Design Manager
>>>>>> NICET Certified
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to