You would hope someone edited the spec and just didn't leave in the boiler 
plate stuff (stop laughing) but you can't rely on that being the case.  I've 
seen plenty of specs where all the EQ lingo and requirements were still shown 
as being required and the Design Category was an "A".  

So yeah, I'd launch an RFI for sure.  Make someone do the job they were paid to 
do.



Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Group Lead
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SCĀ  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard 
Mote
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fredrick MD, Seismic Zone?

RFI time, the specifications call for bracing. I was tasked with finding out if 
bracing is indeed required. I've wasted enough of my time and the forums time. 
The structural sheet calls it;
Risk Category III
Seismic Importance Factor 1.25
There are places for about 10 more line of information but they all have X's 
where there should be data.


Richard L. Mote
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve 
Leyton
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fredrick MD, Seismic Zone?

Right.  Provisions for seismic protection of buildings and building systems in 
the IBC and also in NFPA 13 are now all based on ASCE 7.  We rolled a new code 
on 1/1/14, so moved forward to ASCE 7, 2010 here in
CA.   ASCE standards establish parameters for when a building is
required to be seismically engineered.   The structural engineer of
record for a given project is usually charged - sometimes in conjunction with 
the soils engineer - with determining whether a particular parcel is subject to 
those provisions.  As Travis says, seismic has changed; IMHO, it's not for the 
sprinkie to determine if seismic protection is required, only to verify with 
the SEOR or through the construction documents whether or not it's required.

Steve Leyton




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis Mack
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fredrick MD, Seismic Zone?

Seismic has changed DRASTICALLY from what we used to do.  The SE will have to 
provide you the structural design category and the Ss for the project.  
Hopefully it is SDC of A or B and you don't have to worry about anything.

But, it is definitely no longer 40' / 80' and 4 way every change in direction.

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:[email protected]

On 1/23/2014 9:38 AM, Richard Mote wrote:
> Structural design notes sheet is no help, we are sending an RFI for
clarification. I haven't  had to worry about seismic locally for about
10.5 years so I am not as well versed as I should be.
>
> Richard L. Mote
> Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Travis Mack
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Fredrick MD, Seismic Zone?
>
> What does the structural design notes sheet provide?  Is it Seismic
Category C or higher.  If so, bracing is required on fire sprinkler systems.  I 
don't think the seismic maps really apply any longer.  You need to know the 
Seismic Design Category, then you need the Ss values so you can calculate your 
bracing.
>
> Travis Mack, SET
> MFP Design, LLC
> 2508 E Lodgepole Drive
> Gilbert, AZ 85298
> 480-505-9271
> fax: 866-430-6107
> email:[email protected]
>
> On 1/23/2014 9:15 AM, Richard Mote wrote:
>> Can someone with experience in the area tell me if Seismic bracing is
required in Fredrick Maryland? (21701) According to the maps I found online at 
appears to be the same seismic category as central PA, but not having worked in 
the area before I wanted to be sure there wasn't some local requirement.
>>
>> Richard L. Mote
>> Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
>> 7994 Route 522, Suite 1
>> PO Box 407
>> Middleburg, PA 17842
>> P 570-837-7647
>> F 570-837-6335
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprink
>> l
>> er.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to