(Oops) I think I am correct accidentally- I took 'like for like' meaning any 
manufacturer and being 5.?, 8.?, and 14.?

> On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> You are welcome Steve and thanks Forest but I think I 
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> "Flex heads are acceptable, but if used, the flanges shall be 250 lb rated".
>> 
>>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 4:51 PM, "Mark A. Sornsin, P.E." 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> "Make someone do the job they were paid to do."
>>> 
>>> -Craig L. Prahl, CET
>>> 
>>> 
>>> But-but...Craig!  The specs said "do it per code".  They DID their job.... 
>>> right?  And they also said "make sure the water supply is adequate"; and 
>>> "get the approval of the authorities"; and only use certain types of copper 
>>> pipe, etc.; and no extended coverage sprinklers, 'cuz that's "untested 
>>> technology"...  What more needs to be done?
>>> Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection 
>>> Engineer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
>>> http://www.kfiengineers.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to