Just do it in antifreeze!             <runs and hides>

But seriously folks, if you're a member of the AFSA search the informal
interpretations for this.  I put in a question about this about 2-3 years
ago when we were doing the meat prep room of a supermarket.

I'm not at work, so I can't provide more than that, sorry.


Benjamin Young


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, John Denhardt <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Your AHJ is interpreting incorrectly.  38F is not subject to freezing.
>
> I had this same argument the other day.  I wrote a simple equation,
> stamped and sealed it and submitted it.  I finally received my approval.
>
> Using dry sprinklers when they are not necessary is not good fire
> protection in my opinion. Installing dry sprinklers is doing the owner a
> disservice.
>
> John
>
> Fire sprinklers save lives
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:33 PM, "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sure, 8.4.9 Dry Sprinklers.
> > 8.4.9.1 Where dry sprinklers are connected to wet pipe sprinkler systems
> > protecting areas subject to freezing temperatures, the minimum exposed
> > length of the barrel of the dry sprinkler shall be in accordance with
> Table
> > 8.4.9.1.
> >
> > This section explicitly state where subject to freezing, and 38F isn't
> > subject to freezing.  However, in my case the AHJ has interpreted in the
> > past that if it's not maintained at or above 40F it's subject to
> freezing.
> >
> > Thank You,
> >
> > Bob Knight, CET III
> > 208-318-3057
> > www.Firebyknight.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of IPA
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:28 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> >
> > care to share?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Nix the last question, I just found the answer.
> >>
> >> Thank You,
> >>
> >> Bob Knight, CET III
> >> 208-318-3057
> >> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> >> [email protected]]
> >> On Behalf Of Bob
> >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:09 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >>
> >> 13 words it, in the section on dry pipe systems, at or above 40F.
> >> Where do I find it that on a wet system that I don't need to apply the
> >> temperature in the same way?
> >>
> >> Thank You,
> >>
> >> Bob Knight, CET III
> >> 208-318-3057
> >> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> >> [email protected]]
> >> On Behalf Of John Denhardt
> >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:01 PM
> >> To: <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> >>
> >> Agree - we had done numerous cooler boxes and never have had an issue.
> >> Usually the stored products will be damaged if they freeze.  In many
> >> case, the refrigeration unit shuts down if the temperature drops below
> >> a certain set temperature; 35 degree F is typical.
> >>
> >> Installing dry sprinklers where they are not required or necessarily
> >> is not good fire protection in my opinion.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> Fire sprinklers save lives
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:54 AM, "[email protected]"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Exactly, we do 38F coolers with ESFR's. Never had a ..., I better
> >>> not say
> >> that might jinx it.
> >>> Ron F
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Sprinklerforum
> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >>> John Denhardt
> >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:49 AM
> >>> To: <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> >>>
> >>> If the area is not subject to freezing, no need for dry sprinklers.
> >>> NFPA
> >> 13 only requires dry sprinklers or other method when the area is
> >> subject to freezing AND can not be readily maintained above 40 degrees
> F.
> >>>
> >>> The above is my personal opinion .....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>> Fire sprinklers save lives
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:42 AM, "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ron,
> >>>> The temperature is maintained at 38F.  The sprinklers used were EC
> >>>> OH SR dry sprinklers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank You,
> >>>>
> >>>> Bob Knight, CET III
> >>>> 208-318-3057
> >>>> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Sprinklerforum
> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:37 PM
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >>>>
> >>>> A couple questions. If it is a cooler why do you need dry pendent
> >>>> heads? And if it has to be dry heads and they are on a wet system
> >>>> the RA could still be reduced couldn't it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Ron F
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Sprinklerforum
> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>> On Behalf Of Bob
> >>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:29 AM
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >>>>
> >>>> Ron,
> >>>> Yes this is a remodel adding only the cooler.  The existing ceiling
> >>>> demand was well above the .2 need in the cooler.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank You,
> >>>>
> >>>> Bob Knight, CET III
> >>>> 208-318-3057
> >>>> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Sprinklerforum
> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>> On Behalf Of rongreenman .
> >>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:11 PM
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> >>>>
> >>>> If the job is just the cooler then I think all the heads is
> >>>> sufficient within the perimeter of the cooler. If it's a part of
> >>>> the larger job you need to calc all the possible design areas. Not
> >>>> knowing the layout I can't say but maybe the ceiling somewhere is a
> >>>> design area, the cooler is potentially a design area, etc. But he's
> >>>> nuts if he thinks you need to add other sprinklers not in the fire
> >>>> area
> >> to make the fire area be 1500 sqft.
> >>>> Real is real. Math is math. Often the twin don't meet.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Mike Hill <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't suppose that you are lucky enough to have a fire rated
> cooler.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Common sense would say that you calculate the cooler.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Common practice would say calculate the cooler and/or a 1500 sq. ft.
> >>>>> area outside of the cooler.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike Hill
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> >>>>> [email protected]]
> >>>>> On Behalf Of Bob
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:47 PM
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> His stand is that I have one of three options that I have not used:
> >>>>> (1) Density/area curves of Figure 11.2.3.1.1 in accordance with
> >>>>> the density/area method of 11.2.3.2
> >>>>> (2) The room that creates the greatest demand in accordance with
> >>>>> the room design method of 11.2.3.3
> >>>>> (3) Special design areas in accordance with 11.2.3.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Keep in mind that this is a jurisdiction that has told me in the
> >>>>> past that you can't use the exceptions in 13 (this was before they
> >>>>> became part of the body), and that they can't use common sense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank You,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bob Knight, CET III
> >>>>> 208-318-3057
> >>>>> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> >>>>> [email protected]]
> >>>>> On Behalf Of Tim Stone
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:41 AM
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Cooler is a closed in room with a space above. You calculate
> >>>>> all the heads inside the cooler if less than 1500 SF. If the area
> >>>>> outside the cooler is fully sprinklered then you probably have
> >>>>> performed calcs already. I'd ask the AHJ to review NFPA 13.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> G. Tim Stone
> >>>>>
> >>>>> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> >>>>> NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler
> >>>>> Design and Consulting Services
> >>>>>
> >>>>>              117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> >>>>> CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
> >>>>>                         [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> >>>>> [email protected]]
> >>>>> On Behalf Of Bob
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:12 PM
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Subject: Cooler Calc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a 1,392 sf cooler.  I calc'ed the entire area of the cooler
> >>>>> and submitted.  The AHJ is telling me that I need to calc
> >>>>> additional sprinklers at the ceiling to have a 1500 sf design
> >>>>> area.  I don't think I need to do this, I was looking at this as a
> >>>>> separate fire area, and I don't see it being much different than
> >>>>> not adding heads below ducts or other large obstructions.  Do I
> >>>>> need to calc additional sprinklers at the ceiling for this
> > application?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank You,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bob Knight, CET III
> >>>>> 208-318-3057
> >>>>> www.Firebyknight.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> k
> >>>>> l
> >>>>> er.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> k
> >>>>> l
> >>>>> er.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> k
> >>>>> l
> >>>>> er.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> k
> >>>>> l
> >>>>> er.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Ron Greenman
> >>>> Instructor
> >>>> Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College
> >>>> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> >>>> Tacoma, WA 98405
> >>>>
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> >>>>
> >>>> 253.680.7346
> >>>> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> >>>>
> >>>> Member:
> >>>> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC
> >>>>
> >>>> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations.
> >>>> -Francis Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> >>>>
> >>>> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F.
> >>>> Kettering, inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >>>> nk
> >>>> l
> >>>> er.org
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >>>> nk l er.org _______________________________________________
> >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >>>> nk
> >>>> l
> >>>> er.org
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >>>> nk
> >>>> l
> >>>> er.org
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> >>> kl er.org _______________________________________________
> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> >>> kl
> >>> er.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> >> er.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> >> er.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> >> er.org
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to