How about just fire extinguishers. 

I have yet to personally conduct a thorough code research on the topic but I 
have dug into a few codes including those mentioned earlier. I haven't found 
anything definitive. 

Given there are sooo many safety precautions, automatic shutoffs, and 
regulations instilled with the transfer of the fuel, this may be a case where 
IF there is an issue after ALL the precautions fail, let the trained emergency 
personnel take care of it. 

I have yet to see any motor fuel dispensing facilities be equipped with any 
fire protection other than extinguishers. There must be a code t back this up. 
They do appear to have sensors/detectors however.

I am not talking about fuel farms...that is something different. 

Duane Johnson
Strickland Fire Protection
Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> EXACTLY.   None of us has ever seen a gas station fire in all likelihood 
> because the equipment is equipped with so many fail-safety devices and so 
> long as idiots aren't smoking or lighting incense as they refuel, it's very 
> low risk, empirically speaking.  If there's a fire on the ground, how well 
> does a canopy trap heat?  With no walls, the horizontal movement of 
> byproducts is going to be fairly high-velocity, no?  Unless you have some 
> fire modeling or test data in hand, your and my guesses are the best we're 
> going to have with regard to the chances of sprinklers skipping or even 
> operating at all.  The AHJ is probably requiring sprinklers for the reason 
> you state - so he/she can sleep at night, so give them sprinklers.
> 
> As to the use of foam by responders, I think everyone would agree that 
> there's a significant difference in the metrics of programming operations in 
> a muni fire department than in the cost-benefit analysis of a fixed foam 
> extinguishing system and the impact it would have on the design of the 
> protected premises.  Water has been successfully fire tested in flammable 
> liquids fires, from mist to ESFR.  So if the AHJ wants sprinklers, give them 
> "sprinklers".
> 
> SL
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
> 
> Wow, really?  What is that stuff the guys in the red trucks spray on liquid 
> fuel spills and over car fires?
> 
> Hate to disagree but OH I is even questionable for a parking garage 
> regardless of what NPFA says and for a gas station well it's just silly.   
> I've never seen a little gas station fire.
> 
> But at the end of the day you do what allows you to sleep at night.
> 
> Craig L. Prahl
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
> 
> Please, stop.  This is NOT flammable liquids storage.   Foam and wind effect 
> and all this other stuff is Henny-Penny-the-sky-is-falling distraction 
> (IMHO). 7.3.5.2 of 30A states, " Where required, an automatic fire 
> suppression system shall be installed in accordance with the appropriate NFPA 
> standard, manufacturer's instructions, and the listing requirements of the 
> systems.   Obviously, NFPA 13 doesn't have a prescriptive for fuel island 
> canopies, so let's use some common sense.   The fuel is stored in UG tanks 
> away from the islands and retail store or cashiers hut.   NFPA 30 doesn't 
> apply as this isn't storage, but Chapter 18 states that when a hose is used 
> in the transfer of F/C liquids as part of an "incidental operation", it shall 
> be equipped with a self-closing valve.   That's what a automotive fuel hose 
> does - it's a dead man that kicks off from several triggers including back 
> pressure and impact.  So the movie scene of a guy having a heart attack and 
> squirting a steady stream of fuel into the air as a crow drops a burning 
> cigarette butt into the pool is ... far-fetched.  At most, we can reasonable 
> expect that there could be a quart of gasoline on the ground if there's an 
> accident, so we would be protecting for that and the cars at the island that 
> are ostensibly full or nearly full of fuel.  Just like in an OH 1 parking 
> garage.
> 
> OH 2 if it's a month ending in Y ... my 3ยข.
> 
> SL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
> 
> This is outside the purview of NFPA 13.
> 
> You're dealing with flammable and combustible liquids, hydrocarbons on which 
> water alone will have limited affect.
> 
> For fuel loading/unloading stations it is common to employ foam-water deluge 
> for the area below the canopy.
> 
> Also an option is dry chemical.  Pyrochem has a system called ATTENDANT II 
> (distributed by Tyco)
> 
> The HAJ would have to approve either one but more tend to lean towards a 
> sprinklered solution than a one-shot gaseous system.  A very windy day could 
> totally render a gaseous extinguishing system useless.
> 
> For design you do need to consider wind effect on your system discharge.  
> Don't get swayed into the minimum .16 gpm/sf permitted on foam-water systems. 
>  You can have coverage issues again due to wind influences.
> 
> NFPA 30, NFPA 30A, NFPA 16 and NFPA 2001 are good places to start.
> 
> Good luck and have fun!
> 
> Craig L. Prahl
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of James Crawford
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 1:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Canopies Over gads Pumps
> 
> Looking for some direction on the protection of a Gas Service station canopy 
> over the gas pumps.
> 
> 
> 
> We have an AHJ that want the canopy protected, but I can't find anything that 
> outlines the protection requirements for this area. My first thought is Extra 
> Hazard group 1.
> 
> 
> 
> Can someone point me in the right direction
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> James Crawford
> 
> Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
> 
> Phone  604-888-0318
> 
> Fax 604-888-4732
> 
> Cel 604-790-0938
> 
> Email  [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to