It seems as if anyone can join in on this one. So I have just one question. 
What if there is no canopy over the fuel pumps? 

Mark at Aero
602 820-7894

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 3:52 PM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> As the Irish say, "Is this a private fight or can anyone join in?" That old
> saw aside I'm not joining. But I've seen the dry chems. I've tripped over
> the piping. I'm likely to conclude that the pipe is a greater tripping
> hazard than the likelihood of a fire. And the foam canopy systems I've seen
> are in fuel loading facilities (tank farm to tankers, rail or road), not
> fuel dispensing (gas stations). Do fuel loading facilities have the same
> safeguards as the fuel dispensing ones. I know they don't have the 7-11
> store or a bunch of self service amateurs handling the hose lines. But I
> said I wouldn't join this fight as I just brought notions and opinions to a
> data fight.
> 
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I'll clarify, that I have seen a gas station fire and it wasn't a small
>> fire.  An OH I system would have been a joke.
>> 
>> Fire protection systems for gas stations are not totally uncommon and some
>> jurisdictions require facilities to be protected under local code.  Foam is
>> one avenue and dry chem is another.  If there wasn't a market, the mfgrs
>> wouldn't be hawking their wares.
>> 
>> The likelihood of a fire in a gas station is just like the likelihood of a
>> fire in any other occupancy.  When the stars align just right it lights
>> up.  Are they common, not really, do they happen, yes they do.
>> 
>> So as in all things grey that don't reside within the finite pages of
>> black and white text, whatever you choose be sure you can defend it if you
>> have to.   That is all.
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
>> CH2MHILL
>> Lockwood Greene
>> 1500 International Drive
>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:19 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
>> 
>> EXACTLY.   None of us has ever seen a gas station fire in all likelihood
>> because the equipment is equipped with so many fail-safety devices and so
>> long as idiots aren't smoking or lighting incense as they refuel, it's very
>> low risk, empirically speaking.  If there's a fire on the ground, how well
>> does a canopy trap heat?  With no walls, the horizontal movement of
>> byproducts is going to be fairly high-velocity, no?  Unless you have some
>> fire modeling or test data in hand, your and my guesses are the best we're
>> going to have with regard to the chances of sprinklers skipping or even
>> operating at all.  The AHJ is probably requiring sprinklers for the reason
>> you state - so he/she can sleep at night, so give them sprinklers.
>> 
>> As to the use of foam by responders, I think everyone would agree that
>> there's a significant difference in the metrics of programming operations
>> in a muni fire department than in the cost-benefit analysis of a fixed foam
>> extinguishing system and the impact it would have on the design of the
>> protected premises.  Water has been successfully fire tested in flammable
>> liquids fires, from mist to ESFR.  So if the AHJ wants sprinklers, give
>> them "sprinklers".
>> 
>> SL
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:04 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
>> 
>> Wow, really?  What is that stuff the guys in the red trucks spray on
>> liquid fuel spills and over car fires?
>> 
>> Hate to disagree but OH I is even questionable for a parking garage
>> regardless of what NPFA says and for a gas station well it's just silly.
>> I've never seen a little gas station fire.
>> 
>> But at the end of the day you do what allows you to sleep at night.
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
>> CH2MHILL
>> Lockwood Greene
>> 1500 International Drive
>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
>> 
>> Please, stop.  This is NOT flammable liquids storage.   Foam and wind
>> effect and all this other stuff is Henny-Penny-the-sky-is-falling
>> distraction (IMHO). 7.3.5.2 of 30A states, " Where required, an automatic
>> fire suppression system shall be installed in accordance with the
>> appropriate NFPA standard, manufacturer's instructions, and the listing
>> requirements of the systems.   Obviously, NFPA 13 doesn't have a
>> prescriptive for fuel island canopies, so let's use some common sense.
>> The fuel is stored in UG tanks away from the islands and retail store or
>> cashiers hut.   NFPA 30 doesn't apply as this isn't storage, but Chapter 18
>> states that when a hose is used in the transfer of F/C liquids as part of
>> an "incidental operation", it shall be equipped with a self-closing valve.
>> That's what a automotive fuel hose does - it's a dead man that kicks off
>> from several triggers including back pressure and impact.  So the movie
>> scene of a guy having a heart attack and squirting a steady stream of fuel
>> into the air as a crow drops a burning cigarette butt into the pool is ...
>> far-fetched.  At most, we can reasonable expect that there could be a quart
>> of gasoline on the ground if there's an accident, so we would be protecting
>> for that and the cars at the island that are ostensibly full or nearly full
>> of fuel.  Just like in an OH 1 parking garage.
>> 
>> OH 2 if it's a month ending in Y ... my 3ยข.
>> 
>> SL
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:25 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Canopies Over gas Pumps
>> 
>> This is outside the purview of NFPA 13.
>> 
>> You're dealing with flammable and combustible liquids, hydrocarbons on
>> which water alone will have limited affect.
>> 
>> For fuel loading/unloading stations it is common to employ foam-water
>> deluge for the area below the canopy.
>> 
>> Also an option is dry chemical.  Pyrochem has a system called ATTENDANT II
>> (distributed by Tyco)
>> 
>> The HAJ would have to approve either one but more tend to lean towards a
>> sprinklered solution than a one-shot gaseous system.  A very windy day
>> could totally render a gaseous extinguishing system useless.
>> 
>> For design you do need to consider wind effect on your system discharge.
>> Don't get swayed into the minimum .16 gpm/sf permitted on foam-water
>> systems.  You can have coverage issues again due to wind influences.
>> 
>> NFPA 30, NFPA 30A, NFPA 16 and NFPA 2001 are good places to start.
>> 
>> Good luck and have fun!
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
>> CH2MHILL
>> Lockwood Greene
>> 1500 International Drive
>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of James
>> Crawford
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 1:04 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Canopies Over gads Pumps
>> 
>> Looking for some direction on the protection of a Gas Service station
>> canopy over the gas pumps.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We have an AHJ that want the canopy protected, but I can't find anything
>> that outlines the protection requirements for this area. My first thought
>> is Extra Hazard group 1.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Can someone point me in the right direction
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> James Crawford
>> 
>> Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
>> 
>> Phone  604-888-0318
>> 
>> Fax 604-888-4732
>> 
>> Cel 604-790-0938
>> 
>> Email  [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> 
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> 
> Member:
> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC
> 
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
> essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> 
> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
> inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to