Thanks Russell! I prefer round templates for the spray pattern, but had not considered using bigger ones. As soon as it is not too ridiculously early I'll go into the office and try them, but use the same on Example 4 as I use on Example 1.
Brad. On Jun 14, 2016 3:40 AM, "Russell & Carol Gregory" <[email protected]> wrote: > Gentlemen, > > You should be solving this puzzle using 15ft squares to comply with the > usual rules with no uncovered floor areas. > > Alternatively use a circle of 21’-2 1/2” diameter and have no uncovered > floor areas. The 15ft circle is not showing the correct solution. > > The circle is based on the diagonal of the 15ft square. Check that area of > coverage and distance between sprinklers does not exceed the rules maximum > spacing. > > Regards, > > Russell Gregory > > Christchurch > > New Zealand > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brad > Casterline > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 June 2016 12:57 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: Angled Wall Spacing > > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ut5v9vbbk3y5ii/JAMES%20ANGLED%20WALL%20SPACING.pdf?dl=0 > > > > Here is what I was thinking. I agree if using standard coverage sprks > Examples 2 and 3 would need a sprk added, but it is not due to the distance > between B and C. Due to the round pattern and square spacing I believe > Example 4 is (at least) equivalent to Example 1. > > > > Anyone with me on this? > > > > thanks, > > Brad > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Kenneth > Berman > *Sent:* Sunday, June 12, 2016 2:03 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Angled Wall Spacing > > > > using extended coverage allows further distance from walls, which brings > heads closer than 21-2 1/2. > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Parsley Consulting < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I'll chime in as well. > > Example 3 is closer to being correct, as the sprinklers at B and C aren't > more than 7'-6" from a wall, measured perpendicular to the wall. > > The error, to me, is the distance of 21'-2½" between B and C. I don't see > how that would be allowable, even if you were using extended coverage > sprinklers. Table 8.8.2.1.2 limits the distance between such sprinklers, > with the maximum being 20'-0" in OH and LH occupancies. > > I don't see how that would be allowed. > > > > > > > *Ken Wagoner, SETParsley Consulting350 West 9th Avenue, Suite > 206Escondido, California 92025Phone 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181>Visit our > website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * > > On 06/10/2016 12:51 PM, Ben Young wrote: > > Agreed Tony. > > > > On Friday, June 10, 2016, Tony Eggster <[email protected]> > wrote: > > #2 & #3 are both wrong. > > #2 is spaced too far, measured perpendicularly, from the angled wall. > > #3 will require an additional sprinkler between B and C. If you draw a > 15X15 square template on your drawings you will see an obvious void of > sprinkler coverage requiring protection. > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, James Litvak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The problem with A.8.6.3.2.3 is that it only shows the one sprinkler. What > I'm concerned about is the distance between sprinklers B and C. In example > 3 all the sprinklers are spaced correctly from the walls but B and C are > 21'-2 1/2" apart. The way I understand it, they still need to be 15'-0" > along that wall, even though they're spaced correctly from every wall. Is > that correct? > > > > > > James > > > > On Friday, June 10, 2016, Brian Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Check out A.8.6.3.2.3 it should shed some light on it. > > > > *Brian Harris, CET* > > BVS Systems Inc. > > bvssytemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/> > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James > Litvak > *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 1:45 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Angled Wall Spacing > > > > I am wondering if I've been thinking about sprinkler spacing along angled > walls properly. What I mean is walls not at a right angle. The PDF I made > in the link below really helps explain it. In example 1, four heads are > spaced correctly at 225 sq. ft. In examples 2 and 3 one of the walls is > angled. My question is, are either example 2 or 3 correct, or are they both > wrong? My thought is that example 2 is incorrect, and for example 3 to be > correct there would need to be an additional sprinkler along the angled > wall between sprinklers B and C. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0 > > > > James > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > > > -- > > Benjamin Young > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
