I'll chime in as well.

Example 3 is closer to being correct, as the sprinklers at B and C aren't more than 7'-6" from a wall, measured perpendicular to the wall.

The error, to me, is the distance of 21'-2½" between B and C. I don't see how that would be allowable, even if you were using extended coverage sprinklers. Table 8.8.2.1.2 limits the distance between such sprinklers, with the maximum being 20'-0" in OH and LH occupancies.

I don't see how that would be allowed.
*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, California 92025
*****Phone 760-745-6181*
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> ***
On 06/10/2016 12:51 PM, Ben Young wrote:
Agreed Tony.

On Friday, June 10, 2016, Tony Eggster <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    #2 & #3 are both wrong.

    #2 is spaced too far, measured perpendicularly, from the angled wall.

    #3 will require an additional sprinkler between B and C. If you
    draw a 15X15 square template on your drawings you will see an
    obvious void of sprinkler coverage requiring protection.

    On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, James Litvak
    <[email protected]
    <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:

        The problem with A.8.6.3.2.3 is that it only shows the one
        sprinkler. What I'm concerned about is the distance between
        sprinklers B and C. In example 3 all the sprinklers are spaced
        correctly from the walls but B and C are 21'-2 1/2" apart. The
        way I understand it, they still need to be 15'-0" along that
        wall, even though they're spaced correctly from every wall. Is
        that correct?


        James


        On Friday, June 10, 2016, Brian Harris
        <[email protected]
        <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
        wrote:

            Check out A.8.6.3.2.3 it should shed some light on it.

            *Brian Harris, CET*

            BVS Systems Inc.

            bvssytemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/>

            *From:*Sprinklerforum
            [mailto:[email protected]]
            *On Behalf Of *James Litvak
            *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 1:45 PM
            *To:* [email protected]
            *Subject:* Angled Wall Spacing

            I am wondering if I've been thinking about sprinkler
            spacing along angled walls properly. What I mean is walls
            not at a right angle. The PDF I made in the link below
            really helps explain it. In example 1, four heads are
            spaced correctly at 225 sq. ft. In examples 2 and 3 one of
            the walls is angled. My question is, are either example 2
            or 3 correct, or are they both wrong? My thought is that
            example 2 is incorrect, and for example 3 to be correct
            there would need to be an additional sprinkler along the
            angled wall between sprinklers B and C.

            
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0

            James


        _______________________________________________
        Sprinklerforum mailing list
        [email protected]
        <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
        
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org




--

Benjamin Young



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to