Good point. So use round ones on first ex. 1, since it's approved and measure the area of dry floor/total area for 'inherent shadow area'. Then do the same for the other two! On Jun 10, 2016 4:08 PM, "Tony Eggster" <[email protected]> wrote:
> You wouldn't want to use a round one since spacing is determined by LxW. > Rectangles are your friend (square in this case). > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I like Tony's idea of a template but what if you used a round one with >> radius=7.5 feet and used it at A,B,C,D in all three examples? >> On Jun 10, 2016 2:58 PM, "Parsley Consulting" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'll chime in as well. >>> >>> Example 3 is closer to being correct, as the sprinklers at B and C >>> aren't more than 7'-6" from a wall, measured perpendicular to the wall. >>> >>> The error, to me, is the distance of 21'-2½" between B and C. I don't >>> see how that would be allowable, even if you were using extended coverage >>> sprinklers. Table 8.8.2.1.2 limits the distance between such sprinklers, >>> with the maximum being 20'-0" in OH and LH occupancies. >>> >>> I don't see how that would be allowed. >>> >>> *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting* >>> >>> >>> >>> * 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 Escondido, California 92025 Phone >>> 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181> Visit our website >>> <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * >>> On 06/10/2016 12:51 PM, Ben Young wrote: >>> >>> Agreed Tony. >>> >>> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Tony Eggster < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> #2 & #3 are both wrong. >>>> >>>> #2 is spaced too far, measured perpendicularly, from the angled wall. >>>> >>>> #3 will require an additional sprinkler between B and C. If you draw a >>>> 15X15 square template on your drawings you will see an obvious void of >>>> sprinkler coverage requiring protection. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, James Litvak <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The problem with A.8.6.3.2.3 is that it only shows the one >>>>> sprinkler. What I'm concerned about is the distance between sprinklers B >>>>> and C. In example 3 all the sprinklers are spaced correctly from the walls >>>>> but B and C are 21'-2 1/2" apart. The way I understand it, they still need >>>>> to be 15'-0" along that wall, even though they're spaced correctly from >>>>> every wall. Is that correct? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> James >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Brian Harris <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Check out A.8.6.3.2.3 it should shed some light on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Brian Harris, CET* >>>>>> >>>>>> BVS Systems Inc. >>>>>> >>>>>> bvssytemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: >>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James >>>>>> Litvak >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 1:45 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Angled Wall Spacing >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am wondering if I've been thinking about sprinkler spacing along >>>>>> angled walls properly. What I mean is walls not at a right angle. The >>>>>> PDF I >>>>>> made in the link below really helps explain it. In example 1, four heads >>>>>> are spaced correctly at 225 sq. ft. In examples 2 and 3 one of the walls >>>>>> is >>>>>> angled. My question is, are either example 2 or 3 correct, or are they >>>>>> both >>>>>> wrong? My thought is that example 2 is incorrect, and for example 3 to be >>>>>> correct there would need to be an additional sprinkler along the angled >>>>>> wall between sprinklers B and C. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0> >>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> James >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Benjamin Young >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing >>> [email protected]http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
