I like Tony's idea of a template but what if you used a round one with radius=7.5 feet and used it at A,B,C,D in all three examples? On Jun 10, 2016 2:58 PM, "Parsley Consulting" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll chime in as well. > > Example 3 is closer to being correct, as the sprinklers at B and C aren't > more than 7'-6" from a wall, measured perpendicular to the wall. > > The error, to me, is the distance of 21'-2½" between B and C. I don't see > how that would be allowable, even if you were using extended coverage > sprinklers. Table 8.8.2.1.2 limits the distance between such sprinklers, > with the maximum being 20'-0" in OH and LH occupancies. > > I don't see how that would be allowed. > > *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting* > > > > * 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 Escondido, California 92025 Phone > 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181> Visit our website > <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * > On 06/10/2016 12:51 PM, Ben Young wrote: > > Agreed Tony. > > On Friday, June 10, 2016, Tony Eggster <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> #2 & #3 are both wrong. >> >> #2 is spaced too far, measured perpendicularly, from the angled wall. >> >> #3 will require an additional sprinkler between B and C. If you draw a >> 15X15 square template on your drawings you will see an obvious void of >> sprinkler coverage requiring protection. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, James Litvak <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The problem with A.8.6.3.2.3 is that it only shows the one >>> sprinkler. What I'm concerned about is the distance between sprinklers B >>> and C. In example 3 all the sprinklers are spaced correctly from the walls >>> but B and C are 21'-2 1/2" apart. The way I understand it, they still need >>> to be 15'-0" along that wall, even though they're spaced correctly from >>> every wall. Is that correct? >>> >>> >>> James >>> >>> >>> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Brian Harris <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Check out A.8.6.3.2.3 it should shed some light on it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Brian Harris, CET* >>>> >>>> BVS Systems Inc. >>>> >>>> bvssytemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: >>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James >>>> Litvak >>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 1:45 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Angled Wall Spacing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am wondering if I've been thinking about sprinkler spacing along >>>> angled walls properly. What I mean is walls not at a right angle. The PDF I >>>> made in the link below really helps explain it. In example 1, four heads >>>> are spaced correctly at 225 sq. ft. In examples 2 and 3 one of the walls is >>>> angled. My question is, are either example 2 or 3 correct, or are they both >>>> wrong? My thought is that example 2 is incorrect, and for example 3 to be >>>> correct there would need to be an additional sprinkler along the angled >>>> wall between sprinklers B and C. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>> >>> >> > > -- > > Benjamin Young > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing > [email protected]http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
