they are 18 feet X 12 feet

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: June-27-16 9:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: EXTENDED COVERAGE SPRINKLERS

 

If the sprinklers are 18' apart or 9' off of walls, then 5 x 324 SF would be
correct.

 

 

 

Steve

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Travis Mack <[email protected]> 

Date: 6/27/16 6:22 PM (GMT-08:00) 

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: EXTENDED COVERAGE SPRINKLERS 

 

You are reading wrong. You need to calculate 5 ex  COV sprinklers at a
minimum. You don't have to do 5x324. If they only cover 1400 sq ft for
whatever reason so be it. You still calc 5. 

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

"Follow" us on Facebook:
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692>
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to MFP Design via:

https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc.
<[email protected]> wrote:

I HAVE A 750 SQFT CLASS ROOM. DUE TO THE CONFIGUARTION OF THE LIGHTS AND A
FEW BUMP OUTS IN THE WALLS. I NEED TO USE  FIVE   18x18 EC SPRINKLERS.

 

IF I READ THE CODE CORRECTLY. I NEED TO CALCULATE 5 TIMES 324 SQFT. WHICH IS
1620 SQFT.  WONDERING IF I AM READING THIS RIGHT?

 

I DON'T SEE THE ADVANTAGE WHEN I CAN USE 7 STANDARD Q.R. SPRINKLERS TO COVER
THE SAME ROOM. 11' CEILINGS MY DESIGN AREA WOULD ONLY BE 923 SQFT.

 

AM I MISSING SOMETHING?

 

THANKS

 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to