thanks that is what i was wondering. i was still going to calculate them at
a 18X18 coverage and demand. which hydraulically would be covering 1620
sqft.

 

pretty confusing even when they try to clarify it. lol

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET
Sent: June-27-16 9:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: EXTENDED COVERAGE SPRINKLERS

 

That is using a basis of 16x16 and assuming the sprinklers are maxed out in
a perfect world.

I believe the handbook is trying to clarify that even though you could go to
900 sq ft, you still have to cover a minimum of 5 sprinklers.  So, in
theory, if you have 20x20 spacing, even though you could do 900 sq ft for a
10' ceiling, you would have a potential 2000 sq ft design area.  It is not
saying you have to do an area of 5x sprinkler coverage.  If you sprinklers
cover 18x12, you are required to calculate them at 18x18 listings.  If you
get the QR reduction to 900 sq ft, you are still going to have to calc a
minimum of 5 sprinklers.

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:[email protected]
 
http://www.mfpdesign.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign 
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack

On 6/27/2016 6:38 PM, Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc. wrote:

its say on page 598n 2013 handbook. ``if the reduction of area is applicable
such as that the minimum area density area was 900 sqft, then the 1280 sqft
area would be required.`` according to 11.2.3.2.2.3

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: June-27-16 9:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: EXTENDED COVERAGE SPRINKLERS

 

If the sprinklers are 18' apart or 9' off of walls, then 5 x 324 SF would be
correct.

 

 

 

Steve

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Travis Mack <[email protected]> 

Date: 6/27/16 6:22 PM (GMT-08:00) 

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: EXTENDED COVERAGE SPRINKLERS 

 

You are reading wrong. You need to calculate 5 ex  COV sprinklers at a
minimum. You don't have to do 5x324. If they only cover 1400 sq ft for
whatever reason so be it. You still calc 5. 

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

"Follow" us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to MFP Design via:

https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc.
<[email protected]> wrote:

I HAVE A 750 SQFT CLASS ROOM. DUE TO THE CONFIGUARTION OF THE LIGHTS AND A
FEW BUMP OUTS IN THE WALLS. I NEED TO USE  FIVE   18x18 EC SPRINKLERS.

 

IF I READ THE CODE CORRECTLY. I NEED TO CALCULATE 5 TIMES 324 SQFT. WHICH IS
1620 SQFT.  WONDERING IF I AM READING THIS RIGHT?

 

I DON'T SEE THE ADVANTAGE WHEN I CAN USE 7 STANDARD Q.R. SPRINKLERS TO COVER
THE SAME ROOM. 11' CEILINGS MY DESIGN AREA WOULD ONLY BE 923 SQFT.

 

AM I MISSING SOMETHING?

 

THANKS

 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org






_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to