Yes indeed.
I knew as soon as I hit send it was a bad idea.
I have thought for several years there should be an exception for no QR in
EH, ever since I understood the reasoning.
I should have more soberly made my point that I think small paint booths
are an excellent application -- if you calc all heads flowing why not use
low temp QR? It would be the next best thing to open head deluge, would it
not?
And I apologize for the name calling and meaness of spirit, FWIW. There is
no excuse for that. A big part of how I feel about myself is based on how i
act on this Forum.

Thanks,
Brad
On Aug 9, 2016 1:02 PM, "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have an example of one that I did in Salt Lake recently.  It has 144
> sprinklers in it.  This counts all the exhaust ducts and stacks plus the
> ceiling sprinklers.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
>
> 208-318-3057
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org] *On Behalf Of *[email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 09, 2016 6:29 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: Paint spray application
>
>
>
> How many example of industrial spray booths with more than 40 heads would
> you like Brad?  They exist and are not all that rare.
>
>
>
>
> *Craig L. Prahl*
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> *CH2M*
> 200 Verdae Blvd.
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540
>
> Fax - 864.920.7129
>
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Brad
> Casterline
> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 8:39 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: Paint spray application [EXTERNAL]
>
>
>
> Show me a spray booth with forty sprinklers Steve
>
> On Aug 8, 2016 7:36 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sure.  And fires that can be spread by running fuel such as plastics and
> FCL’s (not to mention BLEVE’s) can set off 40 standard response sprinklers
> in a minute.   I can only imagine the sheer volume of responding sprinklers
> and skipping that could occur based on how smooth or bumpy the roof/ceiling
> assembly is if you started wantonly plugging QR control-mode sprinklers
> into EH fires.   (On paper) MDD = .80    ADD = .275
>
>
>
> My opinion only,
>
> Steve L.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org] *On Behalf Of *Brad Casterline
> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 5:17 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Paint spray application
>
>
>
> Shakey ground is all i have ever known Ken.
> I am no more a professional than you are.
> THINK MAN!
> small spaces with fast fires need the fastest acting sprinklers we can
> muster.
> I've been in court myself a couple times- neither one over sprinklers
> though--
> please stop being so stodgy!
>
> On Aug 8, 2016 7:05 PM, "Parsley Consulting" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I don't know, Brad.  You're standing on pretty shaky ground there.
>
> The decision to use QR sprinklers in an extra hazard occpuancy is a direct
> contradiction to 8.4.1.1.2 of NFPA 13, including the 2016 edition, or a
> similar section number, at least as far back as the 1999 edition.  If you
> install QR sprinklers in a space that is legitimately classed as an extra
> hazard occupancy, aren't you directly contradicting this particular section
> of NFPA 13?  The handbook provides the following explanatory text on the
> topic:
>
> Extra hazard occupancies are characterized by the probability of
> fast-developing fires with high heat release rates that have the potential
> to open a large number of quick-response sprinklers before the sprinklers
> have time to control the fire. The operation of a large number of
> sprinklers in a relatively short time period has the potential to overtax
> the system. For this reason, quick-response sprinklers using the area
> design method of Chapter 11 are not permitted for the protection of extra
> hazard occupancies. Additional perspective on this can be found in the
> discussion of safety margin found in B.2.1.
>
> Further, I'm not aware of any QR sprinkler which has been tested and
> listed by an NRTL for use in protecting extra hazard occupancies.  Barring
> that, to follow the guidance you're suggesting the
> contractor/designer/installer has to violate both NFPA 13 AND the listing
> of the sprinkler.  I'm not suggesting the gloom and doom drama of "people
> could die", however it does concern me greatly when I read suggestions to
> ignore both texts.
>
> My thought about that is to make sure your insurance is paid up, and have
> a good lawyer on retainer.  I don't know of a good defense while sitting in
> the witness chair to a question similar to, "Are you telling me you ignored
> the applicable law and the manufacturer's recommendations for the
> installation of that sprinkler?"
>
> When I have nightmares I think about having to answer questions similar to
> that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Ken Wagoner, SETParsley Consulting350 West 9th Avenue, Suite
> 206Escondido, California 92025Phone 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181>Visit our
> website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> *
>
>
> On 08/08/2016 4:17 PM, Brad Casterline wrote:
>
> We're not suppose to use QR in EH either but I say balderdash.
> That is for big open spaces beacase you could have a bunch of heads going
> off way over there when the emergency is way over here. Small spaces with
> fast fires are better off if you use low temp qr and calc every head
> possible going off
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to