Ummhumm.
You tend to be stodgy too Travis.
I said SMALL AREAS WITH FAST FIRES.
Any time you or anyone else wants to hand me the hemlock for corrupting the
youth is fine.
I'll only need a minute or two.
On Aug 8, 2016 8:38 PM, "Travis Mack, SET" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the point they have all been making is that not everything fits
> into your areas of experience.  Yes, I have seen paint booths in excess of
> 2000 sq ft.  So, the design area per EH2 (.4/2000 with reduction based on
> use of high temp sprinklers) would not encompass the entire area of the
> paint booth.  Therefore, your idea of using sprinklers outside of their
> listing and the prescriptives of NFPA 13 could be quite bad judgment.  It
> could also ruin a person financially if it went real bad, not counting
> other possible scenarios that could play out.
>
> This forum is a great educational tool as well as a great way to bounce
> ideas between colleagues.  We have to remember that there are some people
> new in the industry that may see posts by a frequent poster and think he
> knows more and has more experience than he actually does.  They may then
> take this as the correct approach, when it is quite obviously not the
> correct approach.
>
> By sticking to the guidelines of NFPA 13 where they are very clearly black
> and white, we are best able to defend our actions.  NFPA 13 is not a
> perfect document.  But, it does provide us with definite guidelines and
> legislated criteria we can follow.
>
> If you want to get into performance based design and become the
> responsible engineer of record on the projects you are involved in, then
> more power to you.  However, as most of this board is comprised of those at
> the technician level - including yourself - we do not have that luxury.  As
> such, we do our best to follow the published standards and best practices
> of the industry.
>
> Back to the original question, I have frequently seen these installed as
> pendent sprinklers in the horizontal position.  I also frequently see them
> on flex hose assemblies to aid in  the inspection process.
>
> Travis Mack, SET
> MFP Design, LLC
> 2508 E Lodgepole Drive
> Gilbert, AZ 85298480-505-9271
> fax: 866-430-6107email:[email protected]
> http://www.mfpdesign.comhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
> Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack
>
> On 8/8/2016 6:25 PM, Brad Casterline wrote:
>
> I don't know Ron. The closest I have come to that is the foam pop-up
> nozzles for protecting the B2 Stealths at Whitman AFB a couple hours drive
> from where I grew up.
> It was pretty harry but the normal stuff surrounding it all was fairly
> standard.
> On Aug 8, 2016 8:14 PM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> How about the spray booth for a 747 Brad? Or a B-52?
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Show me a spray booth with forty sprinklers Steve
>>> On Aug 8, 2016 7:36 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure.  And fires that can be spread by running fuel such as plastics
>>>> and FCL’s (not to mention BLEVE’s) can set off 40 standard response
>>>> sprinklers in a minute.   I can only imagine the sheer volume of responding
>>>> sprinklers and skipping that could occur based on how smooth or bumpy the
>>>> roof/ceiling assembly is if you started wantonly plugging QR control-mode
>>>> sprinklers into EH fires.   (On paper) MDD = .80    ADD = .275
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My opinion only,
>>>>
>>>> Steve L.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-bounces
>>>> @lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Brad Casterline
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 5:17 PM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Paint spray application
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shakey ground is all i have ever known Ken.
>>>> I am no more a professional than you are.
>>>> THINK MAN!
>>>> small spaces with fast fires need the fastest acting sprinklers we can
>>>> muster.
>>>> I've been in court myself a couple times- neither one over sprinklers
>>>> though--
>>>> please stop being so stodgy!
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2016 7:05 PM, "Parsley Consulting" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't know, Brad.  You're standing on pretty shaky ground there.
>>>>
>>>> The decision to use QR sprinklers in an extra hazard occpuancy is a
>>>> direct contradiction to 8.4.1.1.2 of NFPA 13, including the 2016 edition,
>>>> or a similar section number, at least as far back as the 1999 edition.  If
>>>> you install QR sprinklers in a space that is legitimately classed as an
>>>> extra hazard occupancy, aren't you directly contradicting this particular
>>>> section of NFPA 13?  The handbook provides the following explanatory text
>>>> on the topic:
>>>>
>>>> Extra hazard occupancies are characterized by the probability of
>>>> fast-developing fires with high heat release rates that have the potential
>>>> to open a large number of quick-response sprinklers before the sprinklers
>>>> have time to control the fire. The operation of a large number of
>>>> sprinklers in a relatively short time period has the potential to overtax
>>>> the system. For this reason, quick-response sprinklers using the area
>>>> design method of Chapter 11 are not permitted for the protection of
>>>> extra hazard occupancies. Additional perspective on this can be found in
>>>> the discussion of safety margin found in B.2.1.
>>>>
>>>> Further, I'm not aware of any QR sprinkler which has been tested and
>>>> listed by an NRTL for use in protecting extra hazard occupancies.  Barring
>>>> that, to follow the guidance you're suggesting the
>>>> contractor/designer/installer has to violate both NFPA 13 AND the listing
>>>> of the sprinkler.  I'm not suggesting the gloom and doom drama of "people
>>>> could die", however it does concern me greatly when I read suggestions to
>>>> ignore both texts.
>>>>
>>>> My thought about that is to make sure your insurance is paid up, and
>>>> have a good lawyer on retainer.  I don't know of a good defense while
>>>> sitting in the witness chair to a question similar to, "Are you telling me
>>>> you ignored the applicable law and the manufacturer's recommendations for
>>>> the installation of that sprinkler?"
>>>>
>>>> When I have nightmares I think about having to answer questions similar
>>>> to that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
>>>> Escondido, California 92025 Phone 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181> Visit our
>>>> website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/08/2016 4:17 PM, Brad Casterline wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We're not suppose to use QR in EH either but I say balderdash.
>>>> That is for big open spaces beacase you could have a bunch of heads
>>>> going off way over there when the emergency is way over here. Small spaces
>>>> with fast fires are better off if you use low temp qr and calc every head
>>>> possible going off
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-f
>>>> iresprinkler.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-f
>>>> iresprinkler.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-f
>>> iresprinkler.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ron Greenman
>>
>> 4110 Olson Dr., NW
>> Gig Harbor, WA 98335
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> 253.576.9700
>>
>> The Universe is monstrously indifferent to the presence of man. -Werner
>> Herzog, screenwriter, film director, author, actor and opera
>> director (1942-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-
>> firesprinkler.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to