Guys,

I'm on vacation right now, otherwise I would get a picture and post it for
everyone.
Its been a while since I've seen this area for this project, and the last
time I really went down there, they still had the drywall up.

I want to say that really only the bottom chord of the TJI is exposed, with
the insulation using the top of the bottom chord as a resting place.  This
is then followed up with hat track running perpendicular to the TJIs.


Benjamin Young

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
wrote:

> also funny is this could be a case where max deflector for unobstructed
> exceeds that for obstructed:
>
>
>
> if extends 4.5" below insulation-- obstructed = 10.5" max below insulation
> due to 6" max below plane of obstructing member, vs 12" for unobstructed.
>
>
>
> you gotta love this stuff
>
>
>
> :) brad
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org] *On Behalf Of *Roland Huggins
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:14 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Ceiling of trusses and insulation - Character set not
> allowed
>
>
>
> ABSOLUTELY.
>
>
>
> What is funny is that Unobstructed with structural members less than 3 ft
> has a spacing limitation of 130SF.  That makes perfect sense for trusses
> with a cumulative negative impact on discharge but why should it be 130 sf
> for a ceiling with 2x4 stringers?  The reason is that after taking 3 cycles
> to FINALLY define an actual depth for unobstructed / obstructed, the issue
> of spacing has not been revisited - YET.  On my list for next cycle (that
> being 2022 since we are in the middle of the 2019 cycle).
>
>
>
>
>
> Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
>
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
>
> Dallas, TX
>
> http://www.firesprinkler.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Ed Kramer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Roland,
>
>
>
> If the structural members extended down below the insulation, but no
> further than 4”, would you still consider it unobstructed?  More than 4” –
> obstructed?
>
>
>
> Ed Kramer
>
> Bamford Fire Sprinkler
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to