I was picturing this as the bottom chords would be visible in the space. That 
was why I voted for 130 sq ft max. 

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
"Follow" us on Facebook: 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to MFP Design via:
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Roland Huggins <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> what Mark said EXCEPT why 130 sf.  The ceiling is the insulation.  The 
> structural embers are a different area (just like above a drop ceiling).  The 
> annex states regarding distance below ceiling but it obviously applies across 
> the board.  For instance, if the only combustible construction is the 
> structural members and they joist are full (and chords covered) does the 
> space still have to be protected?  There was a pubic input submitted on just 
> this issue.  IT passed the table vote but the official ballot has not yet 
> been processed.
> 
> The rub is the lack of guidance on the robustness of attachment.
> 
> NFPA TC member caveat warranted:  not to be considered a formal 
> interpretation by NFPA or any of its technical committees
> 
> Roland
> 
> Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
> Dallas, TX
> http://www.firesprinkler.org
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 22, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Mark Phillips <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Insulation is considered ceiling  A8.5.4.1
>> 130 spacing
>> Use 4.2 heads
>> Reduce Remote Area
>> Aka
>> “What Travis said”
>>  
>>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to