So, for discussions sake take a look at the image link - what would you all
call this system? I have my opinion but I don't see how it's much different
than Ed's original drawing:
https://ibb.co/xSW04dj

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:46 AM J H <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, for discussions sake take a look at the image link - what would you
> all call this system? I have my opinion but I don't see how it's much
> different than Ed's original drawing:
> https://ibb.co/xSW04dj
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:40 AM Kevin Hall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I see that now... looks like I have another PI to add to the NFPA 13
>> list. Look for that line of sprinklers to be removed in the 2025 edition
>> haha.
>>
>> The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
>> interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee
>> Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA assumes no
>> liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not to be
>> considered the official position of the NFPA or its technical committees.
>> AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering services, and this
>> opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as such.
>>
>>
>> Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
>>
>> Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services
>>
>> American Fire Sprinkler Association
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> 214-349-5971
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM J H via Sprinklerforum <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Kevin,
>>> That's true for most of the sprinklers in the diagram but look at figure
>>> A.3.3.206.6 (2019) - the farthest loop from the supply has sprinklers on
>>> it
>>> and it's connecting both loops - those sprinklers are receiving water
>>> from
>>> two mains. Likewise, per the definition of a main the only main in Ed's
>>> example is the center line. Everything else are looped branchlines per
>>> the
>>> definitions.
>>>
>>> JH
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:09 AM Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The annex shows the branch lines fed by the cross main from two
>>> directions,
>>> > the sprinkler can still only receive water from one direction from the
>>> > branch line... that is the distinction in the definition.
>>> >
>>> > The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
>>> > interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing
>>> Committee
>>> > Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA
>>> assumes no
>>> > liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not to
>>> be
>>> > considered the official position of the NFPA or its technical
>>> committees.
>>> > AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering services, and this
>>> > opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as such.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
>>> >
>>> > Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services
>>> >
>>> > American Fire Sprinkler Association
>>> >
>>> > [email protected]
>>> >
>>> > 214-349-5971
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:05 PM J H via Sprinklerforum <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I have a problem with the simplified definition floated out here
>>> that a
>>> > > grid system is one that feeds a sprinkler from two directions
>>> because of
>>> > > the illustration of a looped system in the annex of '13 which shows
>>> > > sprinklers attached to the end portion of the loop resulting in those
>>> > > sprinklers receiving water from two directions. Technically the only
>>> > cross
>>> > > main is the center piping - everything else are looped branchlines. I
>>> > would
>>> > > be prepared for kickback from a knowledgeable AHJ. I would personally
>>> > avoid
>>> > > a design like this if at all possible to avoid the headache of
>>> hashing it
>>> > > out w/ an AHJ. But if it's the difference between a system like this
>>> and
>>> > a
>>> > > fire pump it might be worth the fight.
>>> > >
>>> > > JH
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:04 AM Sean Conlin via Sprinklerforum <
>>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > If you were to put caps on the left and right lines going north and
>>> > > south,
>>> > > > it resembles a compound gridded system and a sprinkler can receive
>>> > water
>>> > > > from both sides.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The east and west lines are essentially the mains and so is the 4"
>>> in
>>> > the
>>> > > > middle.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Yes is has a looped piping  arrangement and is symmetrical but it
>>> is a
>>> > > > gridded system by NFPA-13 definition.  If you were to not tie the
>>> lines
>>> > > > together, it would be a loop.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Sean W. Conlin
>>> > > > E:[email protected]
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This message, including any attachments is considered confidential
>>> and
>>> > > for
>>> > > > use only by the intended recipient(s).
>>> > > > Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
>>> prohibited.
>>> > > > Please delete this communication and notify
>>> > > > Demand Sprinkler Design Inc. if you are not the intended recipient
>>> or
>>> > > have
>>> > > > received this message in error. Demand
>>> > > > Sprinkler Design Inc. accepts no responsibility or liability for
>>> any
>>> > loss
>>> > > > or damage from use, including damage from viruses.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > From: Ed Kramer <[email protected]>
>>> > > > Sent: October 26, 2021 1:31 PM
>>> > > > To: [email protected]
>>> > > > Subject: Gridded dry system
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Is this sprinkler system a gridded system?   I've avoided this
>>> type of
>>> > > > design in the past for dry systems because it 'kinda' a grid, but
>>> not
>>> > > > really.  Now I'm questioning my questioning.  What are your
>>> thoughts?
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Reference NFPA 13 (2019) sections 8.2.3.10 and 3.3.206.5.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2hw3cbvlga4fcq/Dry%20Attic%20System.pdf?dl=0
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Ed Kramer
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> > > > [email protected]
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> > > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> > > [email protected]
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> > >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to