I would call it a Tree/Loop hybrid. :-P

The branchlines are not connecting two parallel cross mains per the
definition of a grid.
JH


On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:50 AM Kevin Hall <[email protected]> wrote:

> If the pipe marked in red is removed and capped off, it eliminates any
> split flows/transfer lines on the branch lines. So with the red pipe
> removed I would define it as a tree. With the red pipe installed, I would
> define it as a grid.
>
> The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
> interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee
> Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA assumes no
> liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not to be
> considered the official position of the NFPA or its technical committees.
> AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering services, and this
> opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as such.
>
>
> Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
>
> Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services
>
> American Fire Sprinkler Association
>
> [email protected]
>
> 214-349-5971
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:47 PM J H via Sprinklerforum <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So, for discussions sake take a look at the image link - what would you
>> all
>> call this system? I have my opinion but I don't see how it's much
>> different
>> than Ed's original drawing:
>> https://ibb.co/xSW04dj
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:46 AM J H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > So, for discussions sake take a look at the image link - what would you
>> > all call this system? I have my opinion but I don't see how it's much
>> > different than Ed's original drawing:
>> > https://ibb.co/xSW04dj
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:40 AM Kevin Hall <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, I see that now... looks like I have another PI to add to the NFPA
>> 13
>> >> list. Look for that line of sprinklers to be removed in the 2025
>> edition
>> >> haha.
>> >>
>> >> The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
>> >> interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing
>> Committee
>> >> Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA
>> assumes no
>> >> liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not to
>> be
>> >> considered the official position of the NFPA or its technical
>> committees.
>> >> AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering services, and this
>> >> opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as such.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
>> >>
>> >> Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services
>> >>
>> >> American Fire Sprinkler Association
>> >>
>> >> [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> 214-349-5971
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM J H via Sprinklerforum <
>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Kevin,
>> >>> That's true for most of the sprinklers in the diagram but look at
>> figure
>> >>> A.3.3.206.6 (2019) - the farthest loop from the supply has sprinklers
>> on
>> >>> it
>> >>> and it's connecting both loops - those sprinklers are receiving water
>> >>> from
>> >>> two mains. Likewise, per the definition of a main the only main in
>> Ed's
>> >>> example is the center line. Everything else are looped branchlines per
>> >>> the
>> >>> definitions.
>> >>>
>> >>> JH
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:09 AM Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum <
>> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > The annex shows the branch lines fed by the cross main from two
>> >>> directions,
>> >>> > the sprinkler can still only receive water from one direction from
>> the
>> >>> > branch line... that is the distinction in the definition.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
>> >>> > interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing
>> >>> Committee
>> >>> > Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA
>> >>> assumes no
>> >>> > liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not
>> to
>> >>> be
>> >>> > considered the official position of the NFPA or its technical
>> >>> committees.
>> >>> > AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering services, and
>> this
>> >>> > opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as
>> such.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services
>> >>> >
>> >>> > American Fire Sprinkler Association
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [email protected]
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 214-349-5971
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:05 PM J H via Sprinklerforum <
>> >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > I have a problem with the simplified definition floated out here
>> >>> that a
>> >>> > > grid system is one that feeds a sprinkler from two directions
>> >>> because of
>> >>> > > the illustration of a looped system in the annex of '13 which
>> shows
>> >>> > > sprinklers attached to the end portion of the loop resulting in
>> those
>> >>> > > sprinklers receiving water from two directions. Technically the
>> only
>> >>> > cross
>> >>> > > main is the center piping - everything else are looped
>> branchlines. I
>> >>> > would
>> >>> > > be prepared for kickback from a knowledgeable AHJ. I would
>> personally
>> >>> > avoid
>> >>> > > a design like this if at all possible to avoid the headache of
>> >>> hashing it
>> >>> > > out w/ an AHJ. But if it's the difference between a system like
>> this
>> >>> and
>> >>> > a
>> >>> > > fire pump it might be worth the fight.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > JH
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:04 AM Sean Conlin via Sprinklerforum <
>> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > If you were to put caps on the left and right lines going north
>> and
>> >>> > > south,
>> >>> > > > it resembles a compound gridded system and a sprinkler can
>> receive
>> >>> > water
>> >>> > > > from both sides.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > The east and west lines are essentially the mains and so is the
>> 4"
>> >>> in
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > > > middle.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Yes is has a looped piping  arrangement and is symmetrical but
>> it
>> >>> is a
>> >>> > > > gridded system by NFPA-13 definition.  If you were to not tie
>> the
>> >>> lines
>> >>> > > > together, it would be a loop.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Regards,
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Sean W. Conlin
>> >>> > > > E:[email protected]
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > This message, including any attachments is considered
>> confidential
>> >>> and
>> >>> > > for
>> >>> > > > use only by the intended recipient(s).
>> >>> > > > Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
>> >>> prohibited.
>> >>> > > > Please delete this communication and notify
>> >>> > > > Demand Sprinkler Design Inc. if you are not the intended
>> recipient
>> >>> or
>> >>> > > have
>> >>> > > > received this message in error. Demand
>> >>> > > > Sprinkler Design Inc. accepts no responsibility or liability for
>> >>> any
>> >>> > loss
>> >>> > > > or damage from use, including damage from viruses.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >>> > > > From: Ed Kramer <[email protected]>
>> >>> > > > Sent: October 26, 2021 1:31 PM
>> >>> > > > To: [email protected]
>> >>> > > > Subject: Gridded dry system
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Is this sprinkler system a gridded system?   I've avoided this
>> >>> type of
>> >>> > > > design in the past for dry systems because it 'kinda' a grid,
>> but
>> >>> not
>> >>> > > > really.  Now I'm questioning my questioning.  What are your
>> >>> thoughts?
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Reference NFPA 13 (2019) sections 8.2.3.10 and 3.3.206.5.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2hw3cbvlga4fcq/Dry%20Attic%20System.pdf?dl=0
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Ed Kramer
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> >>> > > > [email protected]
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> >>> > > [email protected]
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> >>> > [email protected]
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> >>> >
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to