Michael Bayer wrote: > wow this looks very nice. My impression is that its a lot more > reflective of SQLObject's specific API, is this accurate ?
Also, FYI, Daniel and I are already talking a bit about working with each other. ActiveMapper and TurboEntity are very close in spirit, and even share some code. It would be nice if the two could have a shared future. I have even suggested replacing ActiveMapper with TurboEntity at some point down the road. TurboEntity certainly brings more documentation and a new contributor into the mix. I am very excited about the potential ahead! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
