Just reread that and it sounded a bit Jingo -y maybe
Accessible features of use to Mainstream as well. And further discussion will be off list on this. Gregg -------------------------------------------------------- Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. Director Trace R&D Center Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project http://Raisingthefloor.org --- http://GPII.net On Jul 9, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > I think it is better to capture both audiences -- and not make this about > just one group > but I see how you want accessible to stand out > > how about > > > Accessible - and mainstream too. > > > > > Gregg > -------------------------------------------------------- > Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Director Trace R&D Center > Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering > and Biomedical Engineering > University of Wisconsin-Madison > > Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International > and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project > http://Raisingthefloor.org --- http://GPII.net > > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > >> 5. Section 2.4, Title. Change to "Usable for mainstream and accessibility >> purposes." >> >> The current heading is a single word: "Accessible" -- I prefer to keep it >> because it's correct, clear, and short. It catches attention of the >> accessibility people better, including the Access Board that has already >> contacted us, about the specification too. The word 'mainstream" is also >> mentioned at end of section 1, also even in section 2.4, in section 6.2. I >> therefore believe that I've carefully balanced accessibility and mainstream, >> and satisfied both targets, while aiming to achieve the goal of eventually >> becoming an important part of future Accessibility standards. >> (That said, I'll fix the first bullet) >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
