I wouldn't have a problem with taking a recent nightly build and declaring it RC1. Is this the way we want to go?
James Turner Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author: MySQL & JSP Web Applications: Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002 Co-Author: Struts Kick Start ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002 Forthcoming: Java Server Faces Kick Start SAMS, Fall 2003 > -----Original Message----- > From: David M. Karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 3:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1 > > > >>>>> "David" == David M Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> Is there an easy way to get the diffs or comments > of all elements with commits > David> since the 1.1b3 tagging? > > If it's useful, I figured out how to get the diffs listing, > at least, with: > > cvs rdiff -rSTRUTS_1_1_B3 jakarta-struts > > I still don't know how to get the commit comments listing, > but that is less important, if we can see the diffs listing. > > Considering the output I get from this, and approximately 50 > commits since 1.1b3 (according to Martin), I think using the > 1.1b3 tag is not advisable. I can't judge whether having 21 > open bugs is meaningful, as I'm sure some fraction of those > will be unresolvable, or not practical to fix in the 1.1 timeframe. > > -- > =================================================================== > David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; SCJP; SCWCD > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>