I would do those things in an Action as I can't see how they're related to the view. If they were tags they would most definitely not go in the html taglib.

David



From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: <logic:forward> and <logic:redirect>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:11:24 -0800 (PST)



On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ted Husted wrote:

> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:29:00 -0500
> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: <logic:forward> and <logic:redirect>
>
> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > These tags don't belong in struts-html because they don't generate any
> > HTML-speicifc output -- they are perfectly usable when you are generating
> > WML, for example. It's fine to consider a new library for
> > HTML-independent output, but I'm -1 on dumping them into struts-html
> > simply because they are Struts specific.
>
> It's not simply because they are Struts specific. It's because they
> relate to operations associated with HTML pages.
>


Don't they work in WML pages (or any other XML-based document format) too?
They are HTTP specific (or, more properly, redirect is HTTP specific and
forward is servlet-api-specific), not HTML specific.

As a thought experiment, where would you put a new tag to add an HTTP
header?  Or set a cookie?

Craig

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to