Hi All again,
Just to clarify John and Hendrik's suggestions:

- with a non-south-facing vertical mirror you can turn the axis of the date 
scale and the dial ellipse to align with the path, so 12 noon will be due south 
of the centre of the dial (requrement 1). But note that the mirror itself would 
not be aligned with the path. The mirror can be placed just north of the date 
scale which, by the way would have June/July at its southern end - the reverse 
of normal. Or, the mirror could be moveable, sliding along the date scale. This 
would allow a smaller mirror. Otherwise, it would have to be very big indeed.

- with a south-facing non-vertical mirror you can make the scale circular, not 
elliptical, but 12 noon will not be due south of the centre of the dial 
(requirement 2). The date scale is not needed - you always stand in the same 
spot. The mirror can be smaller and non-moveable.


What you cannot do is both requirements together with a single mirror. You 
could perhaps, in theory, do it with two vast mirrors, but the dial would be 
hidden in between them, so the feature visitors would see first would be the 
mirrors, not the dial, and the benefit of having the dial aligned with the path 
would be lost.
You, or Mr Phillips, would have to decide whether you want the dial to be 
circular or to be aligned with the path.

With both types, there's a small problem that should be mentioned - that there 
will be two shadows! Let's say you stand with your back to a mirror and that 
the sun is in front and to the right of you. The direct sunlight falling on 
your right cheek will not reach the mirror, so will cause a shadow to appear on 
the ground in front of you. Also, the sunlight that reflects off the mirror 
onto the back of your head will cause a shadow. So, you will see two shadows. 
Which is telling the time?

With a vertical mirror the shadows are parallel. One appears to touch your feet 
directly - not via the mirror. That's the one to use.

With a reclining mirror, I think it should be placed right next to where you 
stand. One of the shadows will similarly appear to touch your own feet. It's 
also longer than the other. This is the one to use. But I have to confess that 
having two shadows could be very confusing. By the way, rather than reading the 
time on the physical dial, you could read it in the mirror. The hour marks 
would have to be mirror images of normal numbers, of course. Even in the mirror 
you can still see two shadows, unless you're a vampire.

To make the shadows easier to see I would suggest somehow shielding the hour 
marks from direct sunlight. Put something just south of them.

My preference, for what it's worth, would be to use John Lynes' inclined 
mirror. I think this would create a very striking semicircular feature. Indeed, 
it may well be unique in the world, unless John has used it elsewhere. One 
further feature it might be possible to incorporate would be to make the hour 
marks moveable so that they could be turned 15 degrees in summer to show BST. 
That's not possible with most sundials as the hour line angles aren't all 15 
degrees, but with this one they are.

By the way, with an analemmatic sundial that uses a human shadow, one decision 
is how big to make it. An noon in midsummer the sun's altitude is 62 degrees 
and one's shadow is less than three feet. It's a mistake to make the dial too 
big. But the reclining mirror effectively reduces the sun's altitude to just 23 
degrees so the shadow is greatly elongated and the dial can be made much bigger.

Hope this helps
Chris Lusby Taylor
51.4N 1.3W

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Analemma Zonnewijzers 
  To: Chris Lusby Taylor ; John Carmichael ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:27 AM
  Subject: Re: Advice wanted, on 'Analemmatic' sundial orientation


  Hi All,


  very interesting issue, so after all:
  with a verticle mirror with the right azimut you could turn the famous 
analemmatic sundial so the the line with the dates is on a path which is not 
north-south! and the ellips will be alligned with this path

  looks to me that the issue can be solved after all.

  One has to investigate if the dimensions of the mirror are realistic and you 
will need 2 mirrors (or 2 sundials) to cover the whole 24 hours .


  If the azimut of the path is alpha, the mirror should be at alpha/2, 

  kind regards,
  Hendrik


  ---------------------------------
  Analemma Sundials
  H J Hollander
  Fixed +31 20 6374383
  Cell +31 616 462 879
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.analemma.biz
  lat 52 23'     long 4 57' 







    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Chris Lusby Taylor 
    To: John Carmichael ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 
sundial@uni-koeln.de 
    Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:38 PM
    Subject: [SPAM]Re: Advice wanted, on 'Analemmatic' sundial orientation


    Hi John et al,
    I thought at first that John Lynes was making a joke, but you could 
actually do this. If you have a large, fixed, plane mirror you can use the 
sunlight reflected off it instead of the actual sun. By suitably angling the 
mirror you can make the sun appear to rotate about any desired axis, not just 
the earth's axis. So, you can make it appear to rotate about the local 
vertical, just as it does at the Poles. So, just as at the Poles, an 
analemmatic sundial using the reflected light will be circular and the 
gnomon/person will not need to be moved for different seasons. But the numbers 
will go round anticlockwise, which might cause further objections!

    The actual angle you'd need is this, I think: take a vertical mirror, 
facing south, then lean it towards the north at (90+latitude)/2 to the 
horizontal. For 40 degrees North this makes 65 degrees. So, it's facing the 
southern sky, as it were. If it were a dialface we'd say it was a direct south 
reclining dial. Fix it there. Now, put a vertical gnomon close to the bottom 
centre of the mirror and mark out a perfectly semicircular, equiangular dial 
around it. It will work from 6am to 6pm throughout the summer. Or, if you want 
the user to be the gnomon, just mark the spot where they must stand.

    In the winter months, as John said, the sun's too low in the sky for the 
reflection to shine on the ground.

    A mirror of, say, four feet high and eight feet wide would work well. It 
doesn't have to be 100% perfect optical quality. Users should back up to it to 
avoid being dazzled, I suggest. I think this is an excellent solution to what 
at first appeared an impossible brief.

    Regards
    Chris

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: John Carmichael 
      To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
      Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 3:42 PM
      Subject: RE: Advice wanted, on 'Analemmatic' sundial orientation


      Hello John L.

       

      I’ve never heard of such a sundial and I can’t imagine how it would 
function.  I’m not sure I understand the setup and positioning of the mirror.  
Is the mirror permanently fastened to the ground  or is the mirror moveable? 
Does the mirror reflect sunlight onto the sundial face, or do you read the 
sundial by looking at the face’s reflection in the mirror?  I just don’t get 
it.  It sure would be helpful to see a drawing if possible.  

       

      Puzzled in Tucson

       

      John C.

       

       

      From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
      Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:08 AM
      To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sundial@uni-koeln.de
      Subject: RE: Advice wanted, on 'Analemmatic' sundial orientation

       

            Dear Alison

             

            One expedient, at least in theory, would be to fix a plane mirror, 
suitably angled in plan to the main driveway and tilted to convert the 
analemmatic sundial ellipse into a circle.  The position of the human gnomon 
would not vary with the season.  The sundial would receive reflected sunlight 
only on six months of the year, during the summer months, but this is when most 
visitors would be around.

             

            Unfortunately you would need either an enormous mirror or a very 
modest analemmatic sundial.

             

            John Lynes

  -----Original Message-----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Alison ShieldsSent: 03 June 2008 18:57To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Advice 
wanted, on 'Analemmatic' sundial orientation  Dear Sundial Experts, I have 
recently joined this Mailing List, and hope that any memberswill be able to 
give me some assistance on the following situation. Our local Stately Home 
("Kentwell Hall", Long Melford, Suffolk) isconsidering installing an 
Analemmatic sundial, as a new interactiveattraction for visitors - but we are 
getting 'conflicting' advice,on whether this 'Human Sundial' will work in the 
way we want it to.  We have been in discussion with "Modern Sunclocks" 
(apparently theacknowledged 'experts' for these features), who have told us 
thatits central scale of dates must be aligned North/South - plus thathour 
markers must be correctly positioned on an elliptical ring,and which would lie 
on the Northern side of that scale of dates. Photographs on their website ( 
www.sunclocks.com ) confirm this.  However, our 'Director of Operations' (Mr 
Phillips) absolutelyINSISTS that he wants the scale to run exactly parallel 
with ourmain driveway - on a compass bearing which is about 162 degreesfrom 
North, with the hour points placed on its Southern side. He also wants the hour 
points to form an exact semi-circle, andnot be elliptical in shape.  Mr 
Phillips refuses to accept thathe cannot arbitrarily position the Human Sundial 
feature as hewishes, and says that it must be possible to create this so thatit 
could then align with the existing layout of buildings/paths.  Can anyone on 
this Mailing List tell me whether it is possible toinstall a Human Sundial to 
fit any existing orientations, (withappropriate re-calculation of its component 
parts) - or, if not,just confirm that it must be as "Modern Sunclocks" have 
told me. I can then show the 'weight of evidence' to Mr Phillips.  
Because"Kentwell Hall" is a well-known Stately Home (open to the public),we 
should not want to become a 'laughing stock' by installing afeature which does 
not work - despite Mr Phillips assurance that"all types of sundial can be 
adjusted to work, in any location".  Looking forward to all comments (to this 
List, or sent privately).  Sincerely, Alison Shields. 
---------------------------------------------------https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
  
---------------------------------------------------https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
  ______________________________________________________________________This 
email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.For more 
information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________ 

       



--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      ---------------------------------------------------
      https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial




----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ---------------------------------------------------
    https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to