MCBastos wrote: >Interviewed by CNN on 30/05/2011 06:49, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: > That's cute. 8-)
>>if enough sites were compliant, M$ would have to shape up. >> >Actually, I understand that IE9 is reasonably compliant > The phrase you seek is *inching upward* (after YEARS of hobbling the Web). >the gap has been closing since IE7. > ...mostly at a snail's pace. Internet Exploder didn't pass Acid TWO until IE EIGHT fercrisesake. IE7 and IE8 sucked at Acid3; IE9 was a quantum leap there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3#Desktop_browsers_2 >(not 100%, but near enough for most purposes), > Grudgingly complying because they were facing death. The only place I'll give M$ any points is in the each-tab-is-a-separate-process thing. (Ancient) Mozilla is still playing catch-up there; having everything freeze when one tab craps out really sucks. >So it appears that they ARE shaping up. > You left out the phrase "dragged kicking and screaming". _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
