On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Richard Mann < richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> While we're about it, there's a few other potential values for cycleway > (for interest mainly): > > cycleway=buslane (shared with buses) > Has potential. > cycleway=filterlane (explicitly shared with nearside-turning traffic) > Has potential. > cycleway=tight (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is <3.1m wide > Two descriptive. Sounds awfully much like "cycleway=no" to me. > cycleway=spacious (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is >3.7m wide, > more if typical traffic speed is faster than 40kph) > There's something here. If you look at: http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-37.859974,145.16891&z=21&t=k This is Springvale Rd, in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. I'm told that that left lane (on the northbound side) is deliberately wider to cater for cyclists. It's not really a bike lane, but there is some benefit for cyclists there. > cycleway=critical (nearside lane is shared with traffic and between tight > and spacious) > Nah. Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
